Adams could only use the RIM-66A/B Standard, since she was never NTU’d. Those are SARH off a surface radar lock in anti-surface engagement mode, a mode the game’s naval mechanics can’t really represent, not CG. If they were in game properly they would also not be using SACLOS mechanics against air targets either, any more than the RIM-24 should.
Their other flight characteristics would also be quite different from the RIM-24 the ship has in game today.
I don’t understand why we opened the dev server. There weren’t any major changes.
There is nothing more than what I’ve already posted.
@Smin1080p_WT Where is discount for Su-25K/L-39 and Mi-24D for GE? It was Czechoslovak airforce day yday. Or atleast some camo and decal.
fair enough, thanks
Well its not just for any new stuff, the tuning they did for the older stuff would still benefit from a 2nd dev server
got me excited for this update there i thought the type 12i was for normal warthunder since it could be added
They forgot it which is a shame, similarly to how they skipped finnish independence day last year, although fortunately we got air force day this year
Does the US even have a vehicle with an APS system? I can’t think of any off the top of my head, but I can certainly think of some that can be added.
In game not. Irl the M2A4 Bradley, M1A2 SEPv2 and SEPv3 come to mind.
It’s such a shame. Iirc only half of the nations have a tank with hard kill APS in game (I’m being generous here and count the KF41). It was such a hype feature with a lot of possibilities.
M1A2 Sepv2 never operated any hardkill APS in service. Only a small number were pretty heavily modified in order to use it.
This is incorrect.
More M1A2 SEPv2s were modified to use APS… than T-80Bs were to use thermals.
Reminder that T-80B has thermals ingame because a SINGLE vehicle was fitted with them.
XM1302 with iron fist, CATTB with trophy. I’ve also read that the XM1302 was fitted with both raven and iron fist at the same time, but haven’t seen a whole lot about it.
??
@Smin1080p_WT
You are partially forgiven, although the L-39 as domestic aircraft would be more fitting to appear and get discounted, rather than russian made but us operated Mi-24. I am totally not saying this cause i have the 24D and 25K already.
Yeah your right, i shouldve specified on a fixed wing aircraft. I don’t think they really modeled AESA being -ESA until 9 months ago though
How would one drive from St. Louis (I assume this is where they did it since thats where they make the F-15) to some base in Alaska
Major freeways, maybe 80 and/or 90, and then cross into Canada then to Alaska.
Boeing and others also use the railways to ship larger fuselages for assembly, so rail is an option too.
