no sign of an italian plane in the dev server? i am actually very disappointed about this
I’m looking forward to RAM 1, T58 later on, M55s, BMD-4M2, VT-4, Stingray, T-84, another M60 for me to love, B66 my love, Qing-6 later on, Mosquitos and F-5TH at the least.
1 Like
Still funny to me how the Belgians of all people have the same amount of F-16 as the US.
Just waiting on those Dutch event F-16’s lol
because this is an active thread and i’m not going to make a fresh thread for it (i know this is off topic)
are the game servers nuked for anyone else?
playing on EU currently and it’s rubber banding like with the release of the previous update
1 Like
Are Eurofighters with AESA possible options? Currently they are not in service with countries such as UK, Germany, and Italy. So I wonder if prototypes are acceptable?
Nah god forbid japan gets a better armored T series tank
1 Like
6 Likes
Can’t see why not. Aircraft which tested HMDs got them, so aircraft which tested radars could presumably get them.
2 Likes
We of course have prototype aircrafts, such as Mirage 4000 and Yak-141. Just wondering if when Gaijin is saying, “Aircrafts with AESA” if that includes Eurofighter with AESA in their criterias.
Hopefully it does. It’s not like Britain has many other options for an AESA fighter (short of F-35). Unless…
8 Likes
11 Likes
So soon we will have RAF, RAAF, RCAF and IAF under one roof which contains Typhoons, Commonwealth Hornets, Indian Rafales and Su-30s. It’s going to be great
Don’t forget Gripens
6 Likes
True
Britain can get the Tejas Mk1A, which also has AESA. Rn a 2052 AESA and a planned/tested Uttam AESA. Their Jag Darin IIIs also have it
11 Likes
By AESA they could mean ESA because it’s not feasible for every country to have a 4th gen AESA. Russia for instance only has PESA unless they want to go ahead with Mig-31. But I don’t think Russia is included in such a country that needs a new type of radar.
1 Like
Wait is that an Indian Mig-31 ?
@Smin1080p_WT I’m a bit confused by this response to this report maybe you could explain the reasoning a bit more?
[DEV] RAH-66 Random bullet hole in cockpit glass
So if the cause of the issue is known and a fix is ready why not deploy said fix for this coming update? It may be minor but why keep kicking the issue down the road instead of fixing it now. Especially if there’s already a fix for the issue. Would understandably be different if the issue was still being investigated but again a fix is ready why not get it over and done with?
1 Like
Thats a MKI
1 Like
Ok sorry I got a little muddled up lol