This please
1 Like
whats the point of an ATGM launcher on a 120mm gun turret?
wouldn’t a SAM make more sense here?
1 Like
he’s probably talking about prenerf f-15e. That thing was a beast
2 Likes
k-300 prototype IIR missile/asraam rip off with thrust vectoring save me!
Spoiler
1 Like
If they add R-77Ms they’re 100% adding AIM-120D/D-3s
That would be cool but i wish Gaijin would be consistent about this, they are going to give the Chieftain 900 mock up armor and they threw a hissy fit at the suggestion to give the F-15 GE experimental missile pylons. Yet they go ahead and add stuff like the Yak-141 and MCS with full hypothetical capabilities
I will say the F-15C GE realistically wouldn’t need AMBER or MRML if they:
- Improved the FM
- Gave the radar full NCTR
- Gave it partial EPAWSS (360° RWR)
Thankfully they did give the F-15C GE its BOL pods. But if they do these other things it will be just fine.
AMBER racks are pretty much 100% denied at this point since they were never proven to work.
But MRML racks have a high chance of getting added in the future. Smin said the GE could get them if the devs find them necessary to stay competitive. That essentially means US players will be US players, drop the stats of the GE by being bad at the game, and we’ll get MRML pylons.
2 Likes
This has NEVER been an argument given against modern additions (because everything is classified), we have Chinese and Russian weapons that all we know about is some brochure and that mock ups of them were put next to a plane on an airshow. This is what i mean by inconsistency, they should have just said we’ll consider the pylons as a suggestion and move on if they really dont want to add them to at least stay consistent…
Please, let there be an Dev server update today
Nej, we must beg harder to be blessed with such a thing
If anything they should be adding AIM-260
Facing off against Rafale, Typhoon, Su-30, it would be nice to have 12 missiles so it can fit more alongside the Su-30 as a 14.3 missile truck, along with the other things.
And ofc, AMRAAM buffs, but that isn’t Golden Eagle or even F-15 specific
Is this dev blog going to take into account feedback from many users?
Just look at this topic - the very idea of introducing a new change to the naval-gamemode is considered by the absolute majority of people to be absolutely terrible.
~250 people voted, of which 91 percent voted against.
And this topic isn’t isolated either; numerous independent posts, without any prior agreement, have written about their complete rejection of the current concept.
Once again - The War Thunder Naval and players absolutely DO NOT NEED any further nerfs to ship survivability and session lifespan! - I wrote about this too, representing, among other things, the loyal WTFE-community, whose goal was to make the naval mode successful for WarThunder and comfortable for players. Is anyone even listening to us?
After all, it formulates what players really need - to return survivability, accuracy, and maps to the level of early spring 2025!
We don’t need to be told how new mechanics should work; We need it NOT to be INTRODUCED.
So far, all changes to the naval gameplay mechanics since the Leviathans patch have only destroyed any enjoyment of the game.
If the current changes are introduced, it will simply be the final blow to the warthunder naval.
Thank you for your attention.
12 Likes
How about having all of them in the same tree hehehe
So it’s still going to face Rafale, Typhoon, and Su-30, but top tier is worse overall
yak141 was intended for military service
The difference between AMBER and MRML is that MRML is actually used in service by the F-15EX. So we know they at least work today. And if I read the MRML bug report correctly, the GE and EX share a mission computer, meaning it’s possible the GE could have received updates to use MRML pylons.
AMBER is different since it was never seen outside of mockups, and it has never been used IRL.
F-104G CCV was literally in military service before being modified
it had 1300 hours airborne
Any dev update?
Still on .34 for me :/