Dope i did not know that. I will cirrainly have to dig into this some more
Are you of the sweden main variant too?
Yeah, i just included the image of the camo cause M90 camo is pretty good looking imo
Yup, lol, I love my swedish tanks
Nah let’s wait until they actually acquire and receive some of them. The Swedish heli tree is already outragious as is, no need to make it even worse.
FIY there’s already this thread about SWE helicopters, but feel free to start a new one if you want to
Yeah but one thats more focused on a specific heli would be better besides that thread is more derailed itself
I agree 100% but if they wanted to add the fnf missile thats one way to do it.
For a moment, I thought that was something from Star Wars :D
Haha it isn’t even that Sci-Fi looking if you think about the japanese “Kyūshū J7W Shinden” :D
I’m a sucker for pusher-prop airplanes and the P.75 even has contra-rotating pusher propellers with an extremly sleek design and a very strong dual-engine. Only the downward rudder could be kind of problematic during take-off or landing.
The Henschel P.87 would be another such plane, just bigger:

@Smin1080p_WT Is it intended that Kh-59 can only be fired with traditional TV lock, or there’ll be possibility to select point on the map and fire, since it has IOG and GNSS?
yeah i saw already and played around with it on the dev server for a bit
ballin but at what cost
Still it lacks APK-9 pod, kinda sad
well we also dont get MITL
if we had that the missing pod would be an issue
but without MITL it isnt
Honestly I do as well. When ever I see those things I’m like hey I can take paper vehicles a bit more.
They could limit “paperplanes” to arcade where you can balance stuff as needed without having to rely on historical accuracy too much, so missing flight-model data wouldn’t be a hindrance.


