Major Update "Seek & Destroy" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 4)

to be exact you didnt xD you just revealed that. Under consideration doesnt mean it will happen^^
But thank you for telling us the decision has been made

Man I’d kill for RB99 on JA37D

1 Like

One question
Do you plan to “upgrade” F-4F ICE stock load out from 2x 9L to 2x 9Li?

maybe specifiy you mean generaly for all aircraft

OK, I found it

Spoiler

Spoiler

1 Like

I mean ICE
But ok, I’ll edit

looks like a hell of a wishlist tbh

could be quite good if implemented as seen

Germany never used triple Maverick racks so that’s out of question.

1 Like

Best they can get is 2 AGM-65D/G

maybe a Ballistic computer for the 3000lb bomb too

We haven’t had any reports on a missing triple rack for the F-4F.

As we also said, AGM-65 variants are under consideration.

5 Likes

Most ships don’t have intimidating names, especially destroyers. Japanese destroyers have simple weather names, Shimakaze translates to island wind, for example.
And the British proved that intimidating isn’t really a good idea either. Last thing you want is, say… HMS Invincible… to go up in smoke.

3 Likes

not mine but would’ve been funny to see some people freak out for real

Hello! Are there plans to replace AIM-9L with AIM-9M for the planes that still have AIM-9L at 13.00?

Many users understandably consider AIM-9L unfit for 13.0, particularly when R-73-armed planes start out with their said best missile (R-73) right away from stock, while AIM-9M planes must go through a large stock grind with AIM-9L until finally unlocking 9M, the R-73 equivalent.

5 Likes

It was funny while it lasted.

I would love those!! Of course I’ll plant a Dutch flag on them and then use my Fokker G.1A as air support!!

France never used (more like, couldn’t use) HOT-3s on their Tigers.
SAF never used 9Ms or SkyFlash missiles on their Gripens
Italy never used DM53 on their Arietes

The “never used” is no longer an argument that can be made when it comes to modifications/equipment here, especially since it concerns the balance of the vehicle in question.

uh naw god no my Phantom is getting passively nerfed now

yes, but i was talking about its current sight, or rather, the seeker of its missiles, isnt stabilised

while it is on other jets

it’s not like additional mavericks make it any better at 12.7 ground