“…expanding this tree’s battlecruiser roster and smoothing out the progression to the current top British battlecruiser; HMS Hood.”
I didn’t know “add frustrating grind” was called “smooth out” in Gaijin language. Good to know.
“…expanding this tree’s battlecruiser roster and smoothing out the progression to the current top British battlecruiser; HMS Hood.”
I didn’t know “add frustrating grind” was called “smooth out” in Gaijin language. Good to know.
This is the supercharge shell iirc ?
Not ready yet, it seems.
thanku for the image @gszabi99 , since this one isn’t CDK -visible for the time being.
The new French droptanks seem to be for the Belgian jets, but I don’t know what this Chinese one would be for:
its properly a holdover from copying some stuff from the normal F4F
Well hopefully
Also the fact that 9L(i) hasn’t been seen in the files yet but AIM-120-C-5 and R-77-1 has is not a great sign
F-4F ICE is so sad, i was starting to do germany air, saw how bad it was and now im completely demotivated
its mindblowing how the 9L/i is even a discussion, it should have it from the get go…
want sth funny, look at the bug report for it and how we had to prove its a thing for the f4f ice…
I think like you
1 RU fighter aircraft armed R-77-1 and 3 fighter aircraft from USA & ROCAF mounted AIM-120C-5
My idea is gaijin could add AIM-9M placeholder on F-4F KWS-LV (ICE) and not change BR
Sir that is perfect common sense.
GJ literally was about to force us to stock grind with an old place holder missile they gave us back in the day that was needed for the same exact reason one is needed today.
But refuse to give us the Aim-9M today? They could not be bothered to model the Aim-9L(I)??!
What were they doing for the last 4 months? Copy pasting F-15s?
Active missiles were already modelled for the most part last update and was open for gameplay trial testing.
The 9Li, from what I know, in game should work like 9M but without smokeless motor
too much work. cant have that - here 9L
But Sweden was able to get Rb74(M)… Figures
quoting david, thats an modified aim 9l(I), take that as u wanna
its because the British tornadoes (also the German ones as well it think) could have mounted them. sorry about this, because of us you’ll have to stick with 9ls for the time being.
“let’s remind them of place holder missiles by making them stock grind with one.”
Excellent move GJ, bravo.
friendly reminder, Germany is the main developer and user of the Aim9l(I)
Implying that the missile is under some sort of vague undefined international hold is pretty funny.
He was joking, must of been.
Right?
i think its referring to the fact that the main developers of the missile(germany) is using them on service, GothFembyoHooter pointed out that because of tornadoes they cant mount them on the F4F wich i dont quite understand why tbh
im making a joke, because gaijin would rather not give us something than give germany a functioning jet.
Now Swedish & SAAF JAS39 Gripen C mounted Rb 74(M) only. and 1 or 2 years Rb 74(M) replace by Rb 98 (IRIS-T) with max BR up to 13.3
But I want JAS39 Gripen A in sweden tech tree lose Rb 74(M) and lose HMS mode & SARH from PS-05A radar
sadly this will make me want to not play germany air for a long while