Yea even after all those years they still hate that idea.
I guess FA2 will suffer for a certain amount of time until Gaijin do something about it.
What makes me question is the Tornado F3 late, im not even sure if i should grind and spade that thing against 13.0 Fox-3 carriers.
Again, I think it really needs BOL to be fixed and buffed back up to IRL levels.
Flight model also need some adjustments, not just BOL’s.
Flight model on the F3 (and all tornados) is a placeholder. We are still awaiting leading edge slats that should have a notable buff for the aircraft…but we’ve been waiitng 18 months so I don’t think it’s ever coming
1 Like
Yeah… I’m just hoping the F3 and FA2 get their placeholder cockpit HUDs replaced ASAP. SIM is gunna be nearly unplayable in both.
because gaijin seldom listen to people‘s idea
Yeah, this is just stupid. Come on Devs. Harrier Gr3 HUD IS NOT SUITABLE.
Fix this ASAP, Its hard enough at 10.3 with 2x Aim-9ls to operate with NONE of the correcy symbology. But at 12.3 vs 13.0s with 0 symbology. Is just stupid.
2 Likes
i can attest as someone who has the namer, it’s terrible, genuinely. it has terrible side armor and it gets ammoracked by artillery and 7.62 machineguns due to the exposed 30mm ammunition that doesn’t have blowout panels.
So why are the Type 16 and Rooikat 105 the same and lower battle rating, but with better ammunition? The Vextra 105 already faces 10.0 and 10.3 constantly because of all the premiums there, to speak nothing of the extremely padded USSR lineup at that area. There’s plenty of future vehicles that can be added to 9.7 to make a lineup, gimping the Vextra isn’t going to help at all.
4 Likes
@Smin1080p
Sorry if you have already answered this, but is the new M908 shell on the M1A1/M1A2 currently a placeholder? It’s pretty much a copy pasted M830A1 when it should be HE with a cover piercing cap.
You could have used late versions of the AMX30 Roland (10.3), the historical Tiger ARH (10.3), the repaired AMX40 (10.3), or even the Leclerc prototype (10.3) to create a complete and historically accurate French 10.3 lineup. Instead, it seems you may be attempting to build a 9.7 lineup that is neither historical nor balanced and is rather “disabled.”
“Disabled” refers to the fact that this 9.7 lineup neither has armed helicopters with strength, nor air-superiority fighters, let alone ground-attack aircraft. The existence of the 9.7 lineup is to disgust French players and provide quality fodder for the 10.0/10.3/10.7 lineups of other countries.
NO French player would play 9.7, just give us the historical Vextra 105!
6 Likes
anyone having the bug where ur flares disappear in ground rb
1 Like
I notice they have so many reports of bugs in this thread, they re-pinned the bug reporting procedure to the top of the forum. My thoughts:
- What do you do if your bug report is apparently ignored? I am still showing 0 squadron activity. IF it is fixed, does it mean those points we previously worked on are simply gone forever?
- Perhaps you wouldn’t have so many bug reports in the forum if you actually fixed the bugs associated with the bug reports you ignored.
- Maybe, as some have already suggested, this update simply wasn’t ready and was pushed to market with the philosophy of fixing it after we get the bug reports? Isn’t that the same philosophy which resulted in the Great Rage Quit from Star Wars Galaxies? (I found out from my son many years later that I was a part of that Great Rage Quit. Didn’t even know that was a thing at the time.)
2 Likes
I can understand not wanting to give it F2, someone in the Vextra thread, using a calculator estimated around 450+mm of pen for it. But the thing I don’t quite get is that the G2 cannon was designed with NATO 105mm ammunition compatibility in mind, they could have completely historically given it DM33 like the Rooikats or something.
I guess it could get DM33, but I’d prefer the F2 round, since it’s unique to France and would give the Vextra a more modern feel to it.
You do know that Netherland and German are different langages, yet very similar to one an another?
Also, Dutch is part of BeNeLux, and that in this Lux/Ben being closer to France that France recieved it.
Finally, most your argues have nothing in common,… and are used to fullfill your Dream.
Now that’s said: yes i agree that Fokker should recieves it’s entire cockpit.
2 Likes
I think they’re trying to keep it at 9.7 for whatever reason, and feel like the F2 is too much for that BR for now. But again, in that situation there’s other rounds that could be added that are better than F1 lmao
You do know that Netherland and German are different langages, yet very similar to one an another?
Oh right it’s similar… I guess a rough approximation is the quality we’re used to in this game, Dutch… German… Danish… Swedish… they’re all Germanic languages so it’s all the same.
Also, Dutch is part of BeNeLux, and that in this Lux/Ben being closer to France that France recieved it.
Benelux is nothing, it has no relevance to the military… the latter doesn’t even have a military to speak of and no idea why they’re even mentioned in this… and it certainly has no ties to France.
used to fullfill your Dream
Yeah… my dream of Germany not having a Phantom at top tier when there are solid alternatives, instead you give the F-16s to France when they already have the Mirage and did not need the F-16, then a bunch of copy paste and a lazy implementation of the one unique vehicle added this entire update.
,… stop raging mate, it’s starting to spill out with anger.
Being frustrated is a not a choice, but being able to understand/overcome a situation is better for everyone else.
You also used to compare ACTUAL relations between states, when the Games uses relations of BACK THEN, to add those Sub-trees.
Now, if you’ll excuse me for being factual, when you just spill rage, then enjoy.
(Btw, swedes is also kinda close to german langage wise)
2 Likes