Good evening @Smin1080p_WT .
That bug report You can see it and if you think it’s right to make it?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/1PAtAkF3122x
1 Like
As far as i know it shouldn’t be 8x-12x, there’s already a bug report for that but was never forward i guess.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/50KgdfjQAmOk
Hey, at least the developers spent enough time to model the spall liners in your vehicle, it’s not nearly as bad as this:
Should have coverage all around:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/4UWXiXZMsNMh
And it’s been a week since this was made. So much for things on the dev server being prioritized, it hasn’t even been accepted yet (or even marked as not enough info, I would take that over absolutely nothing). Seeing as how the dev server closes tomorrow as well (?), I strongly believe it won’t be added for the update, or probably the next few too. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I don’t think the Dragoon has even had ANY fixes on the dev server, which I thought the point of the dev server is to fix things, BEFORE they are added.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/6GIof0rYIoe3
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9UTXUzOJXvmL
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Pj8CVqdrDGRS
not really “my” vehicle but wathever, yeah dragoon should get spall-liners and i voted yes on it for being added in the suggestion, so?
it’s also not the only one that needs spall-liner coverage, personally i helped other people to do bug reports (since i’m permabanned from BG page since i dared to help push for fixes lol) so i do not see what is your point in answer to my post of before
1 Like
Could you kindly nudge this for me. Seeing as how the Dragoons protections is very minimal to begin with, I feel as if it is an important piece to its protection.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/4UWXiXZMsNMh
And is there anything regarding a possible BR decrease for the Dragoon as well? Comparing it to other vehicles (similar in role) to it at the same BR, it lacks a considerable amount of features.
1 Like
Its been passed.
6 Likes
Wow within the minute, thanks boss man.
1 Like
My point wasn’t really directed at you (or an answer for that matter), more of branching off of what you said to highlight an issue I’m having. I’m aware that several vehicles are missing spall liners, I only talk of what I know though. I was merely upset because of how long it was taking for them to even accept the missing spall liner report on the Dragoon. They accepted it now though, probably just to shut me up.
Completely understand how you can get banned though, it does not do any help with the sanity of anyone.
ah i see, seemed strange you replied that message to me, we are in the same boat then
1 Like
Yes, yes we are. I have the bad habit of responding to people like I am having a “measuring” contest, but that is truly not my intent.
1 Like
Hi smin, could you forward Kizvy’s report on the R-77 permited launch zone to the devs? while it is not directly related to the update, it does have some relation to it with the adition of the MiG-29M 9-15, and it would impact all R-77/RVV-AE equipped aircraft
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/jpne3ffDEDVa
have a good one
2 Likes
it’s fine, i understood :)
good luck with the dragoon, personally don’t care of US vehicles as i do not play them as i offer help in sources for italy and poland ;) ;) but oh boy if US has a lot of accepted bug reports to fix (m735 lol)
I tend to try not to mess with bug reports. Even before I joined the forums, I had a good idea of how things were handled on the bug reporting side of things (through a certain HSTV-L enthusiast). I felt inclined to report bugs on the Dragoon as it is an addition I advocated for. Never again will I do these sorts of things. Best of luck with the reports you take part in as well, very noble thing for you to help others with them. It’s definitely time for a break from the game though, I won’t even see the Dragoon get added.
1 Like
before i received the hammer, i made some about mistraslations, df105, VT4, Brenus and other things, thank you, good luck to you too!
Could you maybe also pls forward some of these?
actuall Issues
Dang, Smin doing the work of multiple tech mods today
1 Like
Spoiler
Because all tech, suggestion and forum moderators are actually alts of Smin, he works with many PCs in front of him and types with all of them simultaneously because he’s an octopus. Today he just picked the wrong alt /j
4 Likes
while yes, technically it should affect all air craft with r-77, the material that I have and the material that I have seen, at least from primary sources, only confirm it for the mig-29smt.
Like there’s a mig-29 smt radar manual floating out there that also confirms this (couldn’t use it for the bug report but it has the same image), but I haven’t seen this explicitly confirmed for other planes.
The source itself only speaks of zhuk-me
1 Like
Isn’t it basically just for the R-77’s to have increased gimbal limits similar to r-77-1
launch limits, not gimbal limits. But, the source it specific to the mig-29smt. it’s not specific to rvv-ae. You get what I’m trying to say?
like it’s about rvv-ae, yes. But its about rvv-ae use with the mig-29smt fire control system