finally Modelling RCS Reductions would really benefit the game
especially Rafale and Eurofighter can Benefit from this
1 Like
And EC-665 Tiger))))
please can Smin or someone notice this it has 0 reason not to be added
1 Like
This will be yet another beginning of a series of controversies, Alas.
Huh, interesting. Seems like a very arbitrary rule that causes more controversy than it’s worth if you don’t mind me saying. I mean, what would be the issue with implementing multiple versions of the same ship (in different tech trees)? Isn’t that what’s already done in Air/Ground anyway? I’d be super curious to hear what the justification is. It just seems odd in this case to give the Soviets two immensely historical ships but not add them to the countries that made them and where they preformed their feats.
Steering the topic back on track, awhile back it was announced that Rank VI Battleship premiums were coming. Italy and France I noticed still don’t have any, is that something that’s still being planned/worked on?
2 Likes
So a Gneisenau with 283mm turrets has no chance?
the only thing there “studying” is how much it would help the challengers performance (minor nation tanks cant be to good)
At this point I am sure they ALREADY have noticed.
It’s impossible they haven’t.
Not adding it is a conscious, purposeful decision on their end.
They do not wish the tank to be properly modelled. Same goes for all those obvious, easy and clear fixes they still haven’t implemented.
After so many years it’s impossible they just “don’t know” about them. They know, they do. I am sure of it. They just don’t want to.
Hopefully in the afternoon
If it exists, it is most likely available before the end of work hours in Budapest, Hungary, kinda within 3 and half hours to go
1 Like
i would love for smin to answer on why this hasnt been implemented yet
1 Like
correctly modelling the RCS of Helicopter rotors will immediately Zero that advantage tho
1 Like
Also would be good to get some 4/4.5 gens with some level of stealth to test the waters before diving straight in with 5th gens.
Like yes we have the F-117 but we need something to test “stealth” on an actual fighter platform before we get actual stealth fighters.
Like maybe model RCS for the Rafale, Typhoon, F/A-18E/F (or we get Block III’s with it modelled or the F/A-18XT), and get some stealth modifications of aircraft like F-15E1 or model HG V on the PoBIT or get a dedicated HG V F-16.
non Warthunder devs would probably do it like that
I personally believe the F-117 was the Test for Stealth and it’s stealth will be what’s introduced to Warthunder later this year (guess)
nonetheless AESA Radars should have a Very easy time attacking stealth aircraft at all In game distances (65km for ECRS. Mk 0 against F-35)
Probably yeah. It’s fitting that the devs would test stealth ready for 5th gens on a bomber at BR’s where it either doesn’t face radar threats (air) or a few older radar systems.
The issue that baffles me way more is there refusal to fix CR1 and CR2 ready racks. The reports are more than 3 years old at this point I believe and a more recent report even shows that the OES/TES had the rounds currently used as the ready rack removed 🤣
they tested ARH missiles on the F-14 too
they tested AESA Radars on a 13.0 Event plane and a Swedish SPAA
they tested All aspect IR missiles and IR ATGMs on Helos first
Hope ye reconsider this rule for when the Swedish navy pops into the game, the modifications to some ships were so extensive that they might as well have been completely new ships.
Would be a shame to see only one version of them ships it would, especially since it’d make the amount of larger vessels more limited.
1 Like
Yes they absolutely do.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/4UWXiXZMsNMh
Most of the other reports for the Dragoon were accepted or had some response same day, but not this one. Mind you, a report for the Dragoon missing spall liners wouldn’t have needed to be made, if they had fixed the M1128 missing spall liners 2 YEARS AGO (as they share the same chassis). Also, the suggestion for the Dragoon stated it had spall liners, so I literally have ZERO idea how they managed to still add it, without spall liners.
Oh, I know the official answer:
“We can’t fix all issues instantly, they require investigation”, etc.
Because a direct clear photograph of CR2’s missing spall liners, or a crystal clear video of Type 10’s broken steering (all it would take is a single dev to test drive it to feel it themselves) isn’t enough evidence and it requires 5 years of “investigation”, apparently.
4 Likes