The cent2 should be buffed, with a 3-second reload time, limited to ‘revolvers.’ After consuming these 6 rounds, manual reloading is required, then increase its BR to 12.3 or 12.7, both are fine. This is one of the few ‘special technologies’ of Italy.
2 Likes
If Italy loses Cent2’s unique advantage, then the entire tech tree becomes useless, and no one will continue to invest money in grinding.
1 Like
question about the 2s6 pantsir, Why isn’t it folder-ed with the pantsir as it is a side grade to the vehicle, as the only thing it shares is the guns and missile system and imo it should be folder-ed with the pantsir because of that fact. also why is it a higher BR than the standard pantsir when its placed on a chassis that can be 50’cal-ed???
1 Like
Folder +1, obviously, the ‘power’ of the BUK is even greater
Agreed. A full potential Centauro II + Ariete fixed was making me consider purchasing and grinding Italy…
But if they kerf and castrate Centauro II just so it can be a lower BR where it has no lineup and doesn’t belong, the interest is gone.
1 Like
best bit is that the missile system is ground mountable also. so it would make better sense for it to be placed in a folder with the truck pantsir
Munitions are one of the things the developers use for balance. I very much doubt that the D will get Meteors.
1 Like
Maybe it’s a higher BR because the better radar and more missile options?
Geee that increased BR will forever be a mystery.
its the same radar and from what im aware of. the same missiles also
All I can ask is if you have even opened the dev server?
Both radars are better,
You have 2 additional missile types.
And smokes.
2 Likes
ok so the missles are better, and how is the radar better when its the same one from the pantsir?
Plus its not like we’ve seen tanks at different BR’s be folder-ed before because they do it all the time with air and even some tanks in other tech trees.
This time, GNSS is being added to the new air-to-air missiles. What benefits does adding GNSS to the missiles provide?
They are not
Additionally search radar covers the whole elevation at once, not in bars.
As for missiles
You get up to 48 of these(once it is implemented)
And this one
its cracked
So no, it is in no way a sidegrade, and in no way it should have the same BR.
9 Likes
Its not a sidegrade, but a direct upgrade.
9 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT so about the I-Derby ER on the dev server, will the amount of drag on the I-Derby ER be decreased, and will it have more burn time later?
1 Like
Yes, that’s understandable. But as they say, “we’ll wait and see, and we’ll see the answer to the created report.”
1 Like
personally i still feel like it should be folder-ed due to it only being mainly a missile upgrade and the radar most obviously having a longer range and different radar band idk if that changes anything tbh, even when its not the same BR because its been done before. and u gotta remember also that the Tunguska is 50’cal able and almost everything at the BR it will be at, is gonna have a 50 or 12.5mm. and the BR difference is only what 0.7? so it would still be folder-able with the pantsir as its not a full BR above it
ik i have worded it the best so sorry
but would it be folder-ed with it tho, as its quite close anyway?
and ik BR is gonna be a problem because its been done before with the t-54’s and the t55A and t-62