Literally gajin just being…
Bug report managers are greatest ragebaiters
Gaijin:
“We cant add radar screen to the Stormer HVM due to missile type”
Adds similar ish missile to the new Pantsir
Gaijin:
"Good news we can now add a radar screen to the Stormer HVM "
8 Likes
PL-12A is not configured yet. Reports should not be made on stat cards.
3 Likes
How are we supposed to bug report chn stuff when the few scarce sources we have arent enough and on top of that gajin makes stuff up that doesnt exist so that we cant bug report it
Any hidden vehicles in the files? French ones?
That is not what the bug report manager said at all is the problem
Please do not be deliberately disingenuous.
We explained already rhe reason why Stormer did not have the radar screen was due to its current missile physics which needed to be fully reworked, as it was a technical limitation of the previous missile physics.
This has now been done, so the screen can be added.
2 Likes
indeed
2 Likes
I understand this, but the response says PL-12AE != PL-12A and that sources on the AE cannot be used to report the A. Is this true for any future reports as well?
Will the new french carrier be available in sim mode, when france is on the specific team on maps that have carrier spawns?
Hence why I am clarifying to you now.
Couldnt be bothered to give the Stormer HVM its missing IFF and NCTR at the same time though>
Though by all accounts, half the reports that were fixed regarding the Starstreaks now need to be re-reported.
Spread for example. The darts can miss larger aircraft
As I explained to you via PM (which by the way, you did not ask for permission to publicly share before you did anyway), it would be down to the devs discretion.
@Smin1080p_WT can we know how the J-10C WS-10B thrust ended up worse at almost speeds than the previous engine? is the 800 kgf thrust increase on xray just random numbers… is it perhaps placeholder?
1 Like
Because they are entirely unrelated matters and not connected.
This was about missile physical interaction.
Dev server when?
It’s open
But a core part of the radar screen and its functionality. Would have made sense to model IFF and NCTR at the same time as giving it its radar screen as it increases the functionality of said screen
I’d like to apologise for this, I wasn’t aware permission was required and would’ve asked otherwise. It was a question I intended to ask in this thread if it wasn’t so chaotic at the time. I’ll keep it in mind for the future.
4 Likes