Russia and USA mostly. some UK and some JP, but mostly the two big ones
i did notice the stat cards for the new aim120 is basically a copy pasta 120c5 which isn’t surprising sadly
Eh even the US is pretty bare bones, boat is neat, dragoon is nice but no air burst is unfortunate and the F-16 looks mid due to compression.
I’m iffy on them
2 Likes
Yeah, VBCI has air tracking but no airburst, something doesn’t make sense about that. And given that the turret of the Dragoon will be the same as the VBCI, it too will have air tracking (plus LWS). However, there was no modification for LWS/LRF, so I think it’s just missing at the moment. The spall liners though, that’s just blatant …. The M1128 has had a report open for spall liners for 2 years, and the Dragoon uses the same chassis.
same, basically a DOA plane with a new missile which is only 30s more track time. big whoop.
1 Like
i want palmariaaa
1 Like
Maybe a bad opinion but any IFV without anti air ammo or tracking is trash and needs to get something to deal with drones.
I’m tired of gaijin ignoring actual equipment for sake of artificial differences to inspire intrigue.
Was on English too. Will also be able to zoom in on a section of the radar as well.
1 Like
Time for me to introduce you to the Stormer hvm, an SPAA that can’t deal with them either 🤣
(And that could be fixed)
For me, it’s really just giving a vehicle its whole suite of available options. I really hate when Gaijin shows a vehicle in an incomplete state, they have a past of adding things in absolutely horrendous states, so it does not fill me with confidence. And it doesn’t make sense because suggestions for these vehicles already exist, which does pretty much all of the work (on the research side of things) for Gaijin.
I think it’s because gaijin wants vehicles to fill what they want not what they can do.
:sigh:
Yeag, screams of a rushed update. Does surprise me they’d crunch for the AS-90 rather than releasing one of FV107s they had in the files.
Am I the only one who found that feature a bit redundant? I mean, if someone’s struggling enough to require a specific zoom on the conical radar display, just square it and increase the radar scale.
Ah, so another F-16I Sufa situation.
Seems like it. Why do they have to be allergic to 120’s being decent
3 Likes
BVVD talking about the 120D…fingers Crossed! God let the C GE get them!
he straight up says the 120D will be worse at close range, when it should be better
5 Likes
I ALRADY RUN A FULL C5 LOAD OUT!!! I don’t need a hobs 120…I need a 9X for that! my hope is the 120D is a MICA to notch at the ranges I have 700+ kills with the C5 at -_-
1 Like
Also why would I want to be anywhere close to a MICA shooter in a F15…if the 15 gets the Delta??? I want to kill him from 30-40km
cant always have 100% awareness of stuff, and playstyle doesnt matter, the late AIM-120’s are stated to have better close range/HOBS performance.
aim120d for china when ?