😂 yeah ok
Literally every AESA to date is modelled roughly the same way.
I mean, they literally made the C-5 worse when they “tuned” it on its respective dev server.
Not /s required for that :P
1 Like
See my previous answer.
so when is dev server?
Monday
monday
i can understand liking the f16 more but saying its better than the f15 is just delusional
3 Likes
Well the Gripen C’s all use a Gripen A radar instead of their respective MK.3 and MK.4 radar, it’s all just based on blue Vixen as a lot of data is still classified due to the vehicle being in service.
Don’t expect the Gripen radar to get buffed to its correct levels. Besides I guess it’s fine being nerfed for now, I’d rather gaijin put effort into making other placeholder radars more accurate than multi year old vehicles
thats unusual
but in terms of which one fit the needs of the U.S tech tree rn. the f15 was a way better fit
With some of the takes i’ve seen people make seriously then sadly yes… x)
1 Like
It is, but it is what it is. They also didn’t really give any reason either, sooo
It’s almost like there always is a possibility of something not going according to plan
Maybe we can get next best thing and see if there’ll be a dev datamine even if no dev-server today just to hold us over until Monday. But we have roughly another 1-2 hours that devs would have normally updated the dev-client with.
yea but they dont care ofc
1 Like
Maybe they want to get the Hungarian Fw-190 F-8 and the Swedish ground vehicle ready before opening the dev up
1 Like
Something israeli too right?
updates have been getting worse and worse for the U.S since the addition of the f18
1 Like
Uhhh, whatever.
Yes, Eitan IFV