Major Update "Ninth Wave" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

Hi! that triple rack (TER-9A) is able to turn into missile launcher after being attached with LAU-127, LAU-128 and LAU-129 (should be LAU-129 cuz its for the F16) and its able to carried most of the air to air munitions in the world and it has been approved by the Marvin Group which is the manufacturer of those rack.

I believe that this rack do exist because they had been shown multiple times in Lockheed Martins rendered Image and Marvins Group have collaboration with Lockheed Martin. Meanwhile there is a similar thing called TMLA also being mentioned in the armed sales contract between Lockheed Martin and Türkiye which is cancel later due to Türkiye decided to upgrade their F16 fleet by using their own upgrading plan and not using the plan from Lockheed Martin.

But this will be the proof that the related technologies have already been test and being able to use
since it is not possible that US government will approved a sales of an item have never exist.

Even tho we dont have real footage of the MML(Multiple Munition Launcher) or the TMLA (Triple Missile Launcher Adapters) but there is multiple evidence showed that the related technology do exist.

Source 1:Federal Register :: Arms Sales Notification

Source 2:https://ndia.dtic.mil/wp-content/uploads/2022/future/Tues_EGE_24762_Ross.pdf#page=21

Source 3: US10989497B2 - Multi-mission munition adapter - Google Patents Page 6 FIG. 2C

image

3 Likes

If this goes through Russians better get triple rack r77s
about as much evidence for triple rack r77s as ts brah

1 Like

Hey. Unfortunately there is no proof of testing. The order was placed, but nothing materialised thus far.

All of the above information has already been seen and is known to the devs. They are seeing for more than just renders and cancelled orders as it stands.

Any new information is welcome.

2 Likes

Just wanted to give compliments and say that developers did a good job lately in implementing bug reports for the AIM-120D and Derby-ER! @Smin1080p_WT

Great to see these changes.

1 Like

What did they change

They increased AIM-120D’s weight by 1kg (still implementing the only report out there on the AIM-120D) and they significantly buffed Derby-ER which I covered in this post:

1 Like

Alright thx for the info also thx for the reply too :) have a good day/night

2 Likes

Digital plane

be happy it doesn’t just say F-16 (AESA) like it does for our Typhoons because that makes bug reports a lot harder than necessary

1 Like

show me a single source for the Pl-10

My babies

Not pl-10 technically but for the export variant, 90 degree per second turning ability and ±80 seekerhead


Definitely superior to r-74m2 or 74m at least in terms of seekerhead capability
(-r-74m2 has ±60 degree seekerhead gimbal limit before launch, ±75 degrees after launch, and has ±90 degree launch capability thought through iog+datalink)
R-74m:

Spoiler

image

R-74m2

Spoiler

image

1 Like

It needs the Digital TER-9A, not just any TER-9A. Regular TER-9A doesn’t have MIL-STD-1760 connectors
The digital one has a new module on the back with 3 large 1760 32-pin umbilicals to connect to the stores


The normal TER-9A just has basic 26 pin or 23 pin connectors for things like Hydra, located in front of the rear fairing. Where the holes are in the above Digital one
agc

The USAF opted for BRU-57 as a digital ejector rack for JDAM instead of putting JDAM on TER-9A. The USMC has a digital TER (BRU-70/A) with 1760 connections, but it’s only for JDAM carriage on Harrier and doesn’t use the aerodynamic fairings for F-16 carriage
So the status of digital TERs for F-16 is a bit unknown

5 Likes

You should be comparing pl-15 to r-77m, and pl-10 to r-74m2.
R-77-1 and r-74m are early 2000s missiles

1 Like

Yeah I forgot 77M 74M2 exist during conversation.

1 Like

In todays dev server update the Su-24M got a ESM search mode for it’s radar.

Currently you can’t actually lock any targets but it does detect SPAA with radars. Also picking up some ships with radar too.

2 Likes

No no, you already said it. PL-10 and PL-15 are superior to early 2000s missiles

wasnt today

already had it since friday

the su24 is generally unable to lock targets with its radar

Thats not the case.

Kizy says I should’ve compare those missiles to R-77M and R-74M2 because it would be more fair comparison which is true.

Only the Su-24?