Man, we’re not even close to the usual dev-server times which is normally in 4.5 hours.
1500kgf more at 9000 meters near top speed.
@141_allen
Better subsonic performance near sea level. It could be better depending on source material.
Also, the WS-10B is notably better than the WS-10A: And this is before any buffs the J-10C can get from lower channel losses.
Also not sure why people are complaining to me, I’m not sharing any opinions on this matter.
I’m still annoyed J-10C is missing internal fuel.
Ohk
well the usual dev server opening time was 3 days ago
yeah they denied it
And they said Monday today, but maybe if they’re gracious enough they’ll open it earlier today.
So like…
All ESA radars nerfed by 4 times (they were actually functional and bearable unlike mscan and we can’t have working radars in this game)
WS-10B worse than AL-31at every speed except 0 kmh
AIM-120D and PL-12A are copy pastes with no iog drift, these missiles change nothing
Update Ninth Reason to Uninstall
Without a doubt, the Su-57 will be the strongest next-generation fighter in this game lol
BUT au F-18F should be
13,387 kg basic weight
29,900 kg maximum take-off weight
F/A-18F Super Hornet | Air Force
How what happened
When was the server suposed to launch
They never gave us a time, but usually it opens in 4.5 hours from now.
dev server in 20 minutes (no im just coping)
they butchered radar updates, it’s 4x slower now for ESAs
Yeah but it’s just that from experience that speed is next to unachievable for J-10. There is a point when WS-10B pulls away, and that point is hard to get to on most maps. I am still running through a list of alts, but most alts it’s either worse or literally the same.
The curve is what I’m talking about. They copied it and just chucked 1.8t more thrust on every part which is not how it works. I’m looking into what evidence we can get.
How to solve balancing problem between mech-scan vs ESA:
Add more AESA-equipped fighters for nations that lack them (no)
BR decompression (no)
Nerf all AESA radars (yes)
The Gaijin way.
Refresh rate on fastTWS nerfed by 4 times afaik, some people say it’s because of a report nerfing the refresh rate on the bars that got applied globally but I have no idea how true that is so I’ll assume that’s not the case
Irbis DL targets also halved, among other things
Good luck on sources, Allen.
@IsurusOxyrinchus
WS-10B is better than AL-31AT at all speeds below 1270kph near sea level.*
Unless you’re claiming Statshark’s wrong.
We don’t know the tangible differences in ESA scan changes, we just see numbers; and we don’t even know if they’re intended until comment from devs.
I’m going to wait for videos, personally.
how is PL-12A looking like compared to PL-12?
Please noooo
