We have vehicles that don’t have those fictional capabilities so why not just do that if they don’t care
I don’t really play sweden’s ground portion and for air I only exclusively play Finnish planes, don’t really care about what gets added but just something I wonder how gaijin can balance, unless they make up for it with some light strike jets or something
Because gaijin loves to flip flop in rules, point to me where gaijin hasn’t gone back on something or twisted it to allow them to add it?
All Finnish jets are artificially held back via historical load outs rather than the rule that if it can mount it, it will get it that’s why the Finnish planes mig 21 and below lack weapons they can technically mount.
@quartas121 again 2 wrongs may not make a right but you’re forgetting that gaijin loves to flip flop
THIS, this is excellent news; and if it’s to be true, definitely what I would be looking forward to the most this update!!!
Regenerative steering, at last, after 9 years… and even a full Dagor update with even more improved physics!!!
Ok, now I go to bed for good xD
3 Likes
They could bring A109LUH, even though it didn’t carry weapons in Swedish service, still “technically possible” card could be used.
Gonna just say no to this, if we go down this we could add the Eurocopter to Sweden.
I’d rather they use vehicles that are at least used for military service with some form of weapons rather than pure transport but that’s just me.
I’m not afraid to say Sweden heli tree will ever be good or have gaps fixed but I will try to give ideas that have imo a valid reason to be added when they meet my own criteria.
Imo replace the AHS with the Danish MH-60, remove the MI-28 with the Fennec ect ect
Yeah, I still enjoy them anyway it’s pretty much my only interest in that tree, Danish squadron Draken is alright too. That’s my part with that tree ingame at least
Then if your going to be a mood hoover then please go else where, we had it with the Germans tonight we don’t need the US on top
Let him be and we can just skip over the jet ingame, no use bickering back and forth about it but facts won’t change haha
Excuse me but he can’t go around claiming gaijin is “neglecting US F-16s” and then moan about said F-16 that is being added, I’m sorry if that doesn’t fly for you but to me that’s called having two contradictory statement if people want to take him seriously then perhaps he should do less of that
1 Like
What is a f16 “pobit”
Yeah you’re missing out on all the actual Finnish air though. Mig 21 MGBT, MLU 1, Hawk MK.51,51A,MK.66, Gnat, ect ect those are more so my more awaited vehicles
As for actual Finnish made vehicles too bad they are all event/prem
1 Like
stating objective facts = moaning according to you now?
3 Likes
PoBIT = Post Block Integration, upgrade for F-16 block 40/42/50/52 that adds AESA, new ECM, new RWR, cockpit upgrade, and some other stuff
1 Like
I think I get what he means because this PoBIT should’ve been added long ago, but bringing it now and giving it 120Ds and passing it off like it’ll be USA’s chance to be competitive is really poor judgement, fact is this thing really cannot be higher than 14.0, of course the BR remains to be seen but judging by gaijin’s poor balancing decisions (which aren’t balanced at all) we can expect it to be over BR’d for no good reason at all, it’s rough
2 Likes
A bit unfortunate the F-35 is named wrong and is missing a few things that would make it better
“solves nothing balance wise”
its a good addition for filling out the F-16 line but sucks as a top tier jet
5 Likes
Skill issue
3 Likes