An F-15SG has not been in our plans 2 months ago or now for this major. No such aircraft was planned last year or this major. So its not clear what you mean here.
Wdym, it’s super fair only having mechanical scan jets with inferior performance and weapons fighting Su-30sm2 and rafale
lol.
203 of the omani air force is near identical so those prototypes, yet it has the aden gunpod.
theres plenty of technically compatible but not completely realistic loadouts in game to assist in balance. RDA really needs something to help it out, the thing is awful in its current state and BR
when you say nothing is done for balance its implying nothing in the game. thats on me for a misunderstading
for missiles though. KH38MT/MTE has nothing but fake buffs, as its quite literally fake. Fully expecting questionable stuff for the new pantsir missiles too
Why can’t the Singaporean F-16C Block 52, be added to Israel? It has connections due to the fact it uses Israeli weaponry on it. It would be identical to the current one being added. I’m really not sure why this is not being added. It’s a bit ridiculous don’t you think that Israel was the only nation last update to not receive a top tier aesa fighter, and after patiently waiting for 3 months we find out we’re going to have to wait even more months to maybe receive one finally. I can’t remember the last time a nation was left behind for this long. Also let’s not forget last update was extremely disappointing for Israel considering they only got a copy paste Merkava. You’d think we’d get rewarded for patience but here we are.
4 Likes
As we have already shown, the prototype Hawks were different from production Hawks. The gunpod physically cannot fit on the RDA, which is not the case with production variants (203/208/208)
In this case, sadly its not technical compatibility. But physical impossibility.
Well you removed the sentence before the part you are quoting which provides the context, as well as the question I was responding too:
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT While youre answering CBR related questions, do you know if the Sentinel radar for the NASAMS 3 have been fixed internally for a future build?
Without seeing the report link, I have no idea what one we are referring too here.
Not really an answer to my question: Has a time already been fixated on INTERNALLY at Gaijin HQ or will they put out a statement whenever they feel like it.
But its whatever. Dev Server will be tomorrow and that’s enough info.
Naturally we have our own ideal timeframes to open the server up yes, but that’s not something we are going to announce when everything is subject to change. Im not going to say what that time is, as A) It can change B) I will just get accused of “lying” if it moves back / forward etc. Dev Servers are always subject to change, both in their opening and closing times.
Hence why we have said to please wait for the official announcement of the opening so the more set in stone time can be announced.
4 Likes
It’s not that it can’t
It just isn’t being added
From what I can see there are no new updates internally to provide. So its still open.
Waiting for the Dev Server be like:
10 Likes
Thanks! It got accepted 3 months ago, but after that, crickets
I flat out dont buy it. The hawk 200 was advertised with the gunpod as an option. Its nonsensical for them to have done that if it was unfeasible.
i did say that its on me for that misunderstanding.
We will need to see if gaijin sticks to this rule with the new pantsir missile. Do they make a realistic guess or take the russian propaganda figures. Toss of the Coin tbh
Think of it from my PoV. Normally after dev there is the weekend, now there will be… Monday ))
7 Likes
4 Likes
And it does, on production models. Just not on the 200 or 200 RDA prototypes. Sadly there has been no evidence found anywhere since that either of them ever mounted a pod, which supports the physical collision that occurs on this part that is only present on the prototypes and is a different shape on production models.