Are there any long term plans for China and Israel to receive a full sub-tt line?
BRIMSTONE
and vehicles are specifically buffed and nerfed for balance, even when unrealistic.
Chieftain 900 shouldnt have APFSDS as its just a mk5 with a new engine.
all harrier 2 should be able to carry 6 missiles. T10 and NA should be using 9m not 9l too.
AGM 65B on the hawk 200 even though the D model was the standard model by the time the hawk 200 series are built.
no gunpod for the RDA hawk 200.
5 Likes
But it wasn’t nerfed, just gimped upon introduction
Not sure about that, I’m pretty sure they only put it on the plane to take some promotional images. As far as I’m aware Israel never bought upgrades for their block 30s and 40s to support fox 3 missiles.
tbf Smins comment was on missile performance in terms of range and speed and less so the type of seekerhead. Don’t know tho if there are bug reports for that too.
wasn’t that already confirmed to not be possible bc of that specific airframe not allowing such a gunpod to be fitted?
The gunpod couldn’t be added but apparently there was a single internal gun fitted during testing in the 1990’s.
But so far nothing has come of it and it’s unsure whether the devs have even looked into it since we’ve heard nothing about it.
1 Like
No need to shout. Its also already been answered:
Because it physically cannot fit on the RDA prototype and it had no pod mounted at any stage.
Shell loadout has always been a balancing mechanism. Thats got nothing to do with missile performance.
As above. Weponary loadouts is a balancing factor. Once again, not even in the same context as missile performance that I was reponding too.
And another one.
Im not sure what any of these have to do with missile performance, but are all entirely different matters and contexts that you appear to be trying to shoehorn in to a totally different question and answer.
1 Like
Damn, that’s so bad, unfair, and disappointed. They leaked f15sg then delayed 2 months ago lol
An F-15SG has not been in our plans 2 months ago or now for this major. No such aircraft was planned last year or this major. So its not clear what you mean here.
4 Likes
Wdym, it’s super fair only having mechanical scan jets with inferior performance and weapons fighting Su-30sm2 and rafale
lol.
203 of the omani air force is near identical so those prototypes, yet it has the aden gunpod.
theres plenty of technically compatible but not completely realistic loadouts in game to assist in balance. RDA really needs something to help it out, the thing is awful in its current state and BR
when you say nothing is done for balance its implying nothing in the game. thats on me for a misunderstading
for missiles though. KH38MT/MTE has nothing but fake buffs, as its quite literally fake. Fully expecting questionable stuff for the new pantsir missiles too
Why can’t the Singaporean F-16C Block 52, be added to Israel? It has connections due to the fact it uses Israeli weaponry on it. It would be identical to the current one being added. I’m really not sure why this is not being added. It’s a bit ridiculous don’t you think that Israel was the only nation last update to not receive a top tier aesa fighter, and after patiently waiting for 3 months we find out we’re going to have to wait even more months to maybe receive one finally. I can’t remember the last time a nation was left behind for this long. Also let’s not forget last update was extremely disappointing for Israel considering they only got a copy paste Merkava. You’d think we’d get rewarded for patience but here we are.
4 Likes
As we have already shown, the prototype Hawks were different from production Hawks. The gunpod physically cannot fit on the RDA, which is not the case with production variants (203/208/208)
In this case, sadly its not technical compatibility. But physical impossibility.
Well you removed the sentence before the part you are quoting which provides the context, as well as the question I was responding too:
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT While youre answering CBR related questions, do you know if the Sentinel radar for the NASAMS 3 have been fixed internally for a future build?
Without seeing the report link, I have no idea what one we are referring too here.