ngl, want jackfrags’ opinion on the infantry mode
Let me paste my comments on the alleged CDK dump:
Unfortunately most ships are present in game in one shape or the other, therefore they most are going to be non tech tree vehicles at best, which I am definitely not hyped for. Another idea is that those ship names were not selected for the incoming tech tree ship, therefore just gonna stay on the drawing board
Except the USS England and Admiral Scheer. Gaijin just released HMS Fiji, so same main armament on a smaller hull or considering Kutuzov, existing ship with better AA is always welcome
Summary: I don’t think Gaijin is that insane to plan two more Commandant Domines where the existing one is one rank & 0.3 BR higher than it should, definitely worse than Marne and somehow spawn with destroyers.
1 Like
wait… will infantry have a whole new mode or is it in GRB ? (please say new mode)
New mode
1 Like
Theirs a video from the a past dev when it was added for a day where it shows a SEP v2 that was testing the LWS and Rosy system in tandem i.e. using LWS to automatically deploy smoke I’ll find it and link it under this reply when I get it.
Link to original poster: M1a2 sep v3 - #506 by Abyss_Revenant
Video itself: https://youtu.be/7Y0oKCqOL6w
Clear Image from video of Sep or SepV2:
1 Like
new mode they have a link for details for it
Can you take an educated guess what KE-WA2 actually is?
Is that sarcasm or an actual question cause either is kinda dumb
definitely, the CD0 of the J-10C is currently copy paste of the J-10A, i’d like both of those to be lowered cause it makes them not so competitive in the BVR metric because they can’t accelerate past mach efficiently, it’s pretty painful… and i have no idea where gaijin got these numbers
The M829A2 using tungsten alloy material
@Smin1080p_WT Should we wait for drastic changes of J-10C performance and ordinance? Rn for some reason it has drag twice as more of much wider and thicker twin-engined rafale, what feels absolutely unrealistic. FM feels absolutely underwhelming and underperforming with barely finished avionics package
1 Like
Just push the max br to at least 18.0 and decompress everything starting at 8.0
1 Like
as compared to the EFT and rafale it is lacking, and the CD0 drag is way too much for it to be realistic, as well as no WS-10B, so if those are fixed i’d be very happy
this bug report was implemented into the dev server
now we wait for this one, because the autoloader is the main part of the bardelas hvms 60
4 Likes
Haha fr
I think in 2026 year, Gaijin will announce that China will get Jordanian Subtree, to add to China Challenger 1 and Leclerc.
5 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT with the finding of FOUR CVR(T) variants, can we finally expect France to get one for the Benelux sub tree for France?
1 Like
I’m Jordanian, yes I would like my country’s vehicles in the Chinese tree please /s
Iirc correctly that also happened with the ram tank in the UK TT before some foldering happened