can someone tell me the horizontal scan area of super hornet
There was no 14.7 on the dev server yet, hopefully that changes though.
Hell at this point I think they should just yeet the Rafales and AESA EFTs to 15.0 and spread all the other current 14.3s out over 14.3 and 14.7.
It’s wild that we will have another 3 months of Rafale/EFT with nothing at the same BR even coming close.
4 Likes
hope they can just change the cd0(speed to drag parameter) of J-10A/C, this will make it capable. this is what makes J-10 unable to go faster after supersonic
6 Likes
Huh, now thats new.
The M1A2T should be placed in the BR 12.0-12.3 level, and the ZTZ99 should be recalibrated to the BR 12.7 level, instead of being given the KEWA2 to fill the 12.7 gap.
Hence, I started my comment with : Most (if not all) IFVs(IRL) are classed as LT in WT.
You gotta remember the UK is in the middle of the sea, the principal threats that the ADV was designed to counter were Soviet long range bombers, Tu-22 and such. So dogfighting just wasn’t that important, sensors and endurance was the focus. The writing on the wall was it was to be a “stopgap” project while a “proper” fighter was under development as the UK was participating in the many projects the lead to the eurofighter, (The ADV entered service in late '84, only a year and a half before the EAP flew).
It also wasn’t to be a “front line” fighter in a cold war gone hot, that role would have been filled by the Harriers operating from improvised airstrips.
The MoD did look a buying American but the ADV was just cheaper in projected life time costs (the option heavily considered was the F-14) due to having 80% parts commonality with the IDS. Although if the F-18 was available before the ADV project started there probably would have been interest in that, but alas the F-18 and ADV pretty much share a development timeframe, give or take.
4 Likes
For over two years now, France has been without its Exocet air-to-sea missile, one of its most well-known weapons.
During the last update, when I asked you if the missile would be added, you told me it wasn’t a priority yet.
There’s currently an aircraft on the Dev Server that desperately needs this missile.
So please, answer my plea: will there be an Exocet missile on the Rafale?
(and if possible, on the Super Étendard)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/9yBur2zIrd8y
6 Likes
I wait for Polish tech tree
Do we know what are other vehciles for the Winter Event except Mig-25?
These smokers gonna add any T-80 sub sub variant before proper T-80UM
ngl, want jackfrags’ opinion on the infantry mode
Let me paste my comments on the alleged CDK dump:
Unfortunately most ships are present in game in one shape or the other, therefore they most are going to be non tech tree vehicles at best, which I am definitely not hyped for. Another idea is that those ship names were not selected for the incoming tech tree ship, therefore just gonna stay on the drawing board
Except the USS England and Admiral Scheer. Gaijin just released HMS Fiji, so same main armament on a smaller hull or considering Kutuzov, existing ship with better AA is always welcome
Summary: I don’t think Gaijin is that insane to plan two more Commandant Domines where the existing one is one rank & 0.3 BR higher than it should, definitely worse than Marne and somehow spawn with destroyers.
1 Like
wait… will infantry have a whole new mode or is it in GRB ? (please say new mode)
New mode
1 Like
Theirs a video from the a past dev when it was added for a day where it shows a SEP v2 that was testing the LWS and Rosy system in tandem i.e. using LWS to automatically deploy smoke I’ll find it and link it under this reply when I get it.
Link to original poster: M1a2 sep v3 - #506 by Abyss_Revenant
Video itself: https://youtu.be/7Y0oKCqOL6w
Clear Image from video of Sep or SepV2:
1 Like
new mode they have a link for details for it
Can you take an educated guess what KE-WA2 actually is?
Is that sarcasm or an actual question cause either is kinda dumb
definitely, the CD0 of the J-10C is currently copy paste of the J-10A, i’d like both of those to be lowered cause it makes them not so competitive in the BVR metric because they can’t accelerate past mach efficiently, it’s pretty painful… and i have no idea where gaijin got these numbers