yeah info being classified on the actual radars itself also doesn’t help, like I joked yesterday imagine we see the F-35 with the same 70 by 30 TWS.
I made this while I was waiting for response so even if its worthless now ima post it.
It doesnt have it in real life. You are thinking of the EX.
Right but you don’t need classified docs to see if the radar has a gimbal or not, of which I don’t think any US arrays use one
Lets just add the EX next update;)
3 Likes
exactly, problem is we don’t know how wide the scan area of the radars itself is, I don’t really need the 180-200 scan of the EFT’s with the Gimbal i just want a radar that scans the whole area that I have the right now, like the Rafale tws that scans the whole avilable area for the radar.
Either way not a fault of the Devs so sadly nothing I can do.
1 Like
would you want them???
further edit: don’t get me wrong some aircraft can make them actually quite decent, but the Gripen like the f18’s is not one of those airframes.
I am so confused. Why add them then?
My dude please calm it down with the tags a little. Thats 6+ in under 30 mins.
Everything on Gripen is subject to change. None of its loadouts are final.
5 Likes
He’s talking about AMBER
he is talking about other racks
We are not adding the under fuselage racks.
Ah. My bad.
Hey @Smin1080p_WT, will there be a BR cap increase in this update or sometime this year? The Su-30SM2 and Eurofighter (AESA) being added in this update are quite advanced and won’t fit comfortably in the current 14.3 version. Having these powerful aircraft face off against the J-11A, MiG-29SMT, and F-16D… feels a bit grotesque. So if there are any plans regarding BR, I’d appreciate knowing.
Gaijin is adding MRML to GE due to popular demand (it’s still not confirmed if they are functional or not)
However they are denying the twin racks for the CFT pylons of the F-15E/EX because they simply weren’t functional
Same applies to AMBER racks
Well of course i would want them. Just to have the OPTION to use them. If you want to use the aim-120a then fine, but if others would like to try BVR, the c-5’s would be better. Also any plane compatable with aim-120a’s are certainly compatable with the c-5.
They already confirmed rank 9 next year.
also the rafale
8 Likes
Why not AIM120C-8 for JAS39E ? if not at least AIM120C-5 is okay for atm