pretty much but I guess this one is different beacuse idk doesnt fit their idea I guess
also I assume you mean the vickers Mk7 the british turret on a leopard 2 hull
Germany also does not need this vehicle, it adds little to nothing over the Vilkas (APS is the only main difference). Wheres is the UK it: Fills a gap, adds FnF ATGM, gives us a high tier light which we are sorely lacking
1 Like
Apart from that being an event vehicle iirc?
This is an event tank aswell
Which is why I said I would rather it in the German TT so the Germans have a Boxer IN the TT lol.
dont germany literally have their own variant that can still be added to the tech tree lol?
Germany has an equivalent to the CRV Block 2 called the Wombat
2 Likes
Before German mains say Germany.
This “Block II” we are supposed to be getting it not only built by Australia, but also contains Australian-led modifications after feedback from the original boxers they got.
This particular one is Rheinmetall’s initial demonstrator, so it’s not been adapted by Australia at all.
IIRC Block 1s were built in Germany and assembled in Australia with fittings to Australian spec. Block 2s are built in Australia with a greater degree of Australian design input.
2 Likes
Let me try my chance again: Are there any newer AI carriers in development? Rafale M or F-18E should not take off from a USS Forrestal
I suggest USS Harry Truman
This is what I am going off, that it looks to be more the TD/initial offering which isnt as Aussiefied as people think?
Ja that is correct. Tbh I’d have preferred our in service block 2 to this demonstrator model.
But its not though is it? As others said isnt this version the 1 built by the Germans offered to the Aussies, not the 1 built by the Aussies? (with a classic gaijin named it wrong/modelled wrong one moment)
1 Like
Not even that, both block 1 built by germans and block 2 lack aps
This is more of a demonstrator
Can we also keep noting the facts of:
A) Gaijin are lazy
B) Gaijin models can be very incorrect
C) Gaijin vehicle names can be very incorrect
3 Likes
Events arent gap fillers
The name is “Boxer CRV Block 2,” and that name was found before the model. So it’s a case of the wrong model here, when it’s supposed to be the CRV Block II.
Hence why it is a “supposed to be getting” in my comment.
2 Likes
I can name alot that are
isn’t that just the M-Scan EFT we currently have