there’s a whole russian documentary released by russian MOD, only testbeds have al41f1s, while all serial su-30sm2s are still using al31fp
also it still uses bars radar not irbis or anyting like that
1 Like
They did, they said that 2025 will be the year they focus on filling in the gaps. And 2025 is coming to a close…
1 Like
how did they say about kh-38 for su-30 MKM? If it’s possible to carry, so it’s possible to implement in the game xD
su-30sm/su30mki variants shouldnt be able to carry kh38, no plane specific brochures state it carries them while plenty do for other air craft like mig 35 or su35 or su34. its just nonsense because it wasnt actually integrated IRL, just that its compatible with those aircraft should users wish to upgrade their aircraft with that munition. ATP it doesnt matter, gaijin does what they wanna do
4 Likes
Bro is going full Karen lol.
8 Likes
exactly what i meant. we have now a bunch of “theoretically possible” loadouts.
same goes for sm2 if it will be added, as it seems
Do you mean Korea? Hahaha,
@Smin1080p_WT . so i have a question related to the Infantry modes coming to War Thunder. If in the far future it reaches the live server, are there any plans to allow players to choose what ground vehicle is in their infantry lineup and if so, would vehicle spawn costs adjust with BR and class of the vehicle, like if i decide to bring a heavy tank would the spawn cost go from 5 to a higher number?
1 Like
he means Karen
I think it doesn’t really matter that it’s developed after the MKM, considering it is offered to be integrated into older export aircraft. This means that the intergation is technically possible.
That being said, I think it was only advertised to be on Su-30MK derivatives (MK2, MKK, etc.), not Su-30MKI derivatives like the Su-30SM or MKM. So if Gaijin would follow this it would be removed from the Su-30SM and MKM and added to the MK2 and MKK.
I think though that they are arguing that since the MKI is still based on the MK they wouldn’t lose capabilities, so maybe the best we will see is Kh-38 for the MK2/MKK but not removal for the SM/MKMs.
I apologize; I am not a native English speaker and am unfamiliar with the relevant meaning.
However, if this standard is applied, all aircraft that can use the AKU-58 pylon would justifiably be equipped with the Kh-38, which is unreasonable.
Note that the brochure clearly states that the Kh-38 can be launched using the AKU-58 pylon.
1 Like
Yeah, it’s a weird way to handle things. I would much rather see this missile on Su-30MK derivatives that were actually advertised to use the Kh-38 like the Su-30MK2 and Su-30MKK.
2 Likes
Will Germany add a new DIRCM helicopter in the next version, given that other countries are equipped with DIRCM helicopters
Germany has nothing to add
does germany have an option that has LDIRCM?
No
I was gonna say I think when it comes to helis germany is just kinda screwed
1 Like