I hope we can see Chinese domestic CAS weapons alongside maybe a Su-30MK2 in the techtree with some better armament, maybe even with Kh-38.
1 Like
I mean, so was the Typhoon ATGM, doesn’t mean it actually has been made.
My apologies, I may not have made my point clear—but the Kh-38MTE does indeed exist. (Would KTRV publicly sell a missile they don’t actually have? Obviously not.)
The problem is that the Kh-38MTE has little practical utility in real-world scenarios. Instead, Russia opted to procure 150 Kh-38ML missiles in 2024.
Its about time time France got it via the BeneLux. Should be hard asking for it since FOUR NEW CVRT got found so now is a better time than ever
1 Like
You can sell stuff you don’t yet have made or even finished developing, that’s done all the time, especially in the defence sector. You don’t want to spend millions if not billions to develop, design and set up a production line for a product you don’t have a buyer for yet.
There was a 8.5k+ post thread about the very dubious evidence surrounding the KH-38MTs existence, no conclusive evidence for it’s existence was found there.
Tho I think we should stop here, don’t want to reiterate that whole topic here (and I don’t think the mods want us to)
“the complications faced by the Ajax platform have now been solved.”
Spoiler alert. Sadly in the time since this blog was written, they have now not been ))
24 Likes
Hey @Smin1080p_WT will the be any improvement cas for the upcoming eurofighters or is that something we wait should for the dev blog
So, when will the crew damage and self-disassemble be implemented?
I want to know if the Kh-38 on the Su-30MKM will really not be removed. Clearly, it has neither technical feasibility nor authenticity. Even if I have sent several feedbacks, I only get identical replies. The administrators are not taking it seriously at all.
We have no current plans to remove KH-38 from the Malaysian Su-30.
Weaponary is considered if it was possible on a technical level. KH-38 has been offered to export customers.
9 Likes
This is a lie. We can find numerous sources proving that the Su - 30MKM is incapable of being compatible with a missile developed after itself, and there has been no actual export of such a matched weapon configuration at all. Does it really have technical feasibility?
4 Likes
Don’t know if this has been asked before but is Su-30MKK confirmed to be premium? It seems to be a copy and paste of MK2 AMV but the changelog doesn’t have it listed as a premium.
1 Like
You are welcome to submit your evidence via a report here for it to be considered.
Nothing will be removed with claims alone: Community Bug Reporting System
1 Like
I’d really like to talk to the staff in charge of the IS section, but obviously, players don’t have that ability. Once the administrators respond to this question, no further conversation can take place.
Posting relevant content again will only be deemed repetitive. Is there any way to get the staff in charge of the IS section to come to the forum and talk to the general player base?
It should be noted that unlike the players who raised the questions, the development team has never provided any materials to prove their claims.
1 Like
Didn’t they say they will only be working on filling out the current tech trees for now in one of the community updates earlier in the year unfortunately? I also am waiting for the polish tree.
IS Section?
The vehicle has not yet been configured yet. So its loadouts are not yet funished.
1 Like
Gaijin’s Issues section, which I’m used to referring to by its abbreviation (IS section).