Its not currently planned for the regular hanger.
By gaijin logic, if the weapons are capable with the jet, it has them, is it’s made for Su-35, it can be used for 27SM too, again double standards
no. r77 double was show at a show on a su30. not the su30sm but still can be a good source for gaijin.
just like the double rail pl12 shown in j10ce while in game the j10c got it.
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT is there any news on whether or not we will see ground target tracking on MBTs? The current “aircraft tracking” that was implemented last update is quite literally just the ground track mode being used to track aircraft instead of its primary purpose.
BTW now we seen the MB 326B in the dev server, any chance we could see the Impala I and II for the South Africans in the near future too?
Especially with how quick the Hawk 209 came along, it would be nice to have some SAAF gear to go with the Ratels and Eland ^^.
AFAIK people have been really hoping to see more SAAF stuff for ages but really not gotten much beyond the Gripen and a low tier prop iirc
1 Like
9 Likes
All must upvote
2 Likes
Demand? Then could you please address the serious issue of British vehicles being massively over-tiered in matchmaking?
For example:
The only differences between the Challenger 2E and the Challenger 2 are less than 200 extra horsepower and a commander’s thermal imager, yet their BR difference is a staggering 1.0!!! Is this reasonable? And I believe that if weight classes continue to stretch further in the future, you’ll still keep widening the BR gap between them.
Also, the F-111C vs. the F-111F—the F-111C has significantly weaker engines and weaponry, yet they share the exact same BR!!!
Harrier GR.7 vs. AV-8B+: They have identical ground RB, but the AV-8B+ has HD thermal imaging, an all-aspect radar, and AIM-120 missiles—advantages the GR.7 lacks entirely.
And speaking of the AV-8B+, we must mention the most absurd case of identical BR despite an enormous performance gap:
Sea Harrier FA.2 vs. AV-8B+: They share the exact same BR in both Ground and Air RB, yet the AV-8B+ utterly dominates the Sea Harrier FA.2 in nearly every aspect— the Sea Harrier FA.2 has far worse airframe performance, vastly inferior air-to-air weapon loadout, and the AV-8B+’s ground attack capability absolutely crushes the Sea Harrier FA.2 by orders of magnitude…
Where NASAMS 3 dovbleg?
Please leave feedback for BRs on the feedback topics for BR updates when they appear. This is not the place.
Hello @Smin1080p_WT , thanks for all the responses.
Do you know if it has been decided if the Premium Su30-MKK will receive Russian or Chinese Missiles?
I know there’s a response to a report where a developer said they have internal evidence that it is capable of using Chinese PL8 and PL12 missiles but as far as I know it still has Russian missiles on the dev server.
Also will it be available for pre-order soonTM?
I dont necessarily have issue with that as we should have the vastly superior defensive suite and technically better multirole (4x AIm-9M + 4x AGM-65 vs their 2x Aim-9M + 4x AGM-65) but I am annoyed we still dont have our 6x AGM-65 fit and BOL still isnt fixed
Same here, should be fine, they have strengths and weaknesses, just FA2 is artificially nerfed unncessarily.
I agree with some of the other points though.
2 Likes
Final loadouts are still being decided. This one is unlikely to be a pre-order.
1 Like
so when the next BR change will arrive?
Certainly not before this major.
1 Like
Dev extended until monday.
My bet for the Gripen E to be added.
Same
Su-35S would be at least slightly worse than the SM2 with the same engines.
Different engines, Su-35 is probably better.
Also it wasn’t given to Soviets because of the MKM.
Your post is blatant ragebait.
It takes months to years to bring vehicles into a video game.
The manufacturer also claims Su-30 and Su-35.
MKM is also a 2019 iteration of the aircraft, even newer than Su-30SM which itself is a year newer than Su-35, which itself is newer than the Su-30 cited in one of the documents.
Of course there are zero double standards on this issue.