oh yeah i know that’s why im asking to put that prompt in just to test it
the YF-22 also has closer flight performance to the F-22 than the B-2 does (obviously), the mix of stealth, flight perfomance, and offensive capability (all 3 are worse on the YF-22) so it would be a better way to test a production stealth fighter
welp my browser dosent show an AI awnser so all iam seeing is news articles and forum posts
Maybe next year
Dang you using opera bing or duckduckgo?
about that
Who could have guessed that stealthshaping leads to similar designs in aircraft?
Bottom says they might push it back but F-35 going to all nations makes my skin itch.
well December is supposed to be the huge major update that shifts the game
I mean maybe in the 90’s but look at the UK’s 5th gen program and the USA’s 6th gen they both show there are other and better designs to use for stealth
Stealth doesn’t change whether its on a bomber or fighter.
Maybe idk
duckduckgo on Brave
its not just about stealth though, the leaked additions are all fighters and you know fighter gameplay and tactics differ a lot from bomber gameplay. anyways unless the B-2 got like 40-50k ft airspawn it would be completely hopeless to fly and no one would actually play it in air modes. even the YF-22 can protect itself, the B-2 is free food in air outside of sim
@LiquidGod750-live but there is a seperate duckduckgo AI, which gave me this:
which is a far better awnser imo
why is F-35 on there lol
Sure. How about the YF-23 that Northrop keeps trying to sell to Japan.
That should fulfill your requirements.
Or how about a prototype Su-57?
i mean yeah the YF-23 would be great aswell but it was less complete than the YF-22 which is part of why it lost. didnt the prototype Su’s have more complete avionics among other things, than the 1990 YF-22?
it gave an explenation for why
and i think it is a valid point
i also dont think that they are in a specific order
i still think it made a valid point with the f-35 (not it being on the list, but its explenation)