Major Update "Leviathans" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

Just accept that all information on prototypes is wrong and correct at the same time and love the vehicles as they are.
It was a bug report that changed Challenger 3 TD’s engine, not Gaijin’s own research team.

It was player feedback that ended the mountain goating on many maps…

aircraft engines consume fuel in RB and SB gamemodes, going too fast will cause your plane to break, IR missiles can lock onto the sun, all of those effects occur/have occured IRL. hot things like aircraft stand out in thermals, that is real life logic

A bug report based on a twitter post from someone who was against the chosen power pack…

Ask for other nations things based on tech from the US because it’s US tech, even though we don’t have a historical match making.

what does historical match making have to do with it?

Russia is currently the 5th highest win rate at top tier with both Italy and France beating it.
so either US=NATO in your eyes or you’re clueless

“WHY IS US uniqueness getting ruined because other nations are getting our tech wahhh”

Mean while US vs US in a match at top tier while having China on your team, hmm yes very historical

2 Likes

which of these missiles is the fastest and has the highest range ?

thats completely unrelated. its like saying the early MiG-21 should be in the US because they have R-3’s and i can be shot down by an R-3 (AIM-9 copy) in ARB

You ask for countries that are aligned with the US based on historical alliances and tech.
So my question is if an non historical match maker is here which it is then who gives a damn where those nations goes

i mostly ask for vehicles not countries. F-15SA and F-16E sure but a Tornado or Typhoon doesnt make sense. and if it really doesnt matter then you shoudlnt have an issue with the US vehicles going to the US

And you intern doesn’t matter at all if other nations get US C&P stuff : )

I don’t know anything about the nato ones but the YJ-91 is ~130km >Mach 3
KH-31 ~70KM >mach 3
CM-102 ~100km advertised as: “no less then mach 3.5”

And forgot to add to the list the CM-400AKG for China, up to 240km and up to mach 6

So I claim moral victory : D

Not on this list, but He already added it, I just didn’t read ASM-3A has a stated range of 300+km and a speed of Mach 3+

HARM ive seen from 30+ miles (probably for AGM-88B or other early model, and even then a big lowball) to 200km+ (again, probably a lowball) for the AGM-88G

tops out at a little under Mach 3

this says 60nmi+ for the AGM-88E

that harms the US uniqueness, while US getting US stuff does not harm anyone elses uniqueness

1 Like

Can’t harm US uniqueness if it’s not a historical game : P

1 Like

yes they can? historical game has nothing to do with it

1 Like

As I say you 99.9% of the time you’ll be fighting the US on both sides so what’s the point pretending that having historical subs or tech to the parent nations will change that ?