Tech tree placement in matches from my understanding is purely popularity based.
USA and USSR are the most popular, thus will almost never get into matches together.
If Sweden and USA swapped popularity, USA would be on the Soviet team more often.
but Challengers’ reload is bad than others now(i mean even m1a2 can shut 17rounds in 5s reload,but challengers is still 4 round 5s reload…)it’s really balance?
The 4 round ready rack of the Challenger 2 is not only bad for balance, but also unrealistic, there are 20+ charges/projectiles directly below/behind the loader.
Imo the 2A7HU is THE best tank in the game,
Same armor as the German one
.50cal, and better gun and round
compared to the 122B+,
armor isn’t far off but wayyyyyy better thermals
Challenger 2:
Worst mobility at top tier
Worst round at top tier
Average reload, Worst (or among them) sustained fire rate at top tier
Second worst armour profile at top tier- It’s better than the Ariete in that sense
Worst ammo layout at top tier (Charge bins?)
Overall, worst top tier tank (Ariete is at least a good glass cannon- DM53 on a 5s reload is stupid good), just use something else
They’re balancing the players at this point…
The US can also get the AARGM (AGM-88E), which is US Navy improved version with a MMW terminal seeker. There is also the USAF HCSM upgrade (AGM-88F) which uses GPS guidance. Since there is stuff like ASM-3 on this list, there is also the AARGM-ER (AGM-88G) which is both USN and USAF
except the fact there is pretty good evidence that the ready rack for both the challenger 1 and 2 should be more then 4 rounds, if that doesnt work then they could decrease the reload to 4.5 or even 4 seconds, the challenger 3TD also needs its reload dropped from 6.7 to 5 seconds