Unless the multi-vic SPAAs are those new type
Most likely are
i dont think so, they specifically stated they would add these.
My guesses would be strategic bombers or submarines.
Challenger actually does not have a turret basket. But knowing Gaijin they might make a fake one to nerf it.
im asking to gaijin to add the basket for the rest of the mbts, idc if it will nerf challenger and ariete
@Smin1080p_WT Is there anything planned to fix the total number of bombs on the Mirage 2000s for this update ? The bug reports were forwarded over 2 years ago, but nothing has changed yet.
Not planned for this update as far as im aware.
Is there any hope that this will ever be fixed ?
Suspended Armament reports are fixed periodically and are in most majors. Both old and new. So its always possible.
Hey @Smin1080p_WT since you’re here atm, do you have any idea why a feature the Z-10 has had since the earliest prototypes is being removed?
Um challengers didnt have a basket
Modern problems requires traditional answers
DEV update time!
Which apparently didn’t add much of interest
C-3604 Please
The more they update the dev the less exciting most of the new spaa become. So much for Pantsir counterparts lmao.
No C-3604 and my day is ruined
Only difference is found at a glance was they made the AIM-120C5 on the slamraam 300ms slower lol
They also lowered the max launch range of the ground launched C-5 and Derby significantly. They seem like a massive joke now.
Hey. It can be reported. The vehicles are not yet final.
News for the tornado Ret 8 missing armament and countermeasures?
They have been and have unanimously marked not a bug. The report managers required OEM manuals or direct sources, however they are hard to come by for a barely 2 decade old vehicle. We have disclosed that no Z-10 ever lacked MAWS or LWS and this has been noted by the devs, the question in place is why this was changed against historical accuracy in the first place?