Seek and Destroy launched on June 19th. The wiki shows that the overlord event was from June 5th to June 17th and the next event started on the 24th of July.
EDIT:
Operation overlord: [Event] Earn the Churchill AVRE in the Operation Overlord Event! - News - War Thunder
Seek and Destroy: War Thunder "Seek & Destroy" - Changelog - Updates - Game - War Thunder
Flight of the Albatross: [Event] Earn Alcione in the Flight of the Albatross Event! - News - War Thunder
Yup exactly
Hello
The report was not initally handled by a Technical Moderator.
From what I can see the report (or rather the information within) has already since been linked up with an existing forwarded report by a Technical Moderator:
Hello
The CBR automatically detects languages written in the text. Here its most likely picked up on the names of sources / links used and designated it to Dutch. Whilst there is no way to manually change this, It wont impact the handling of the report, rest assured.
so… who else is handling them
Did a dev just straight up close it before looking at it closer, if it wasnt handled by a tech mod?
Or who is doing that job now…?
Either way it doesnt look nice, if either devs just close it like that or if non techmods even just handle them know, without the information how to even handle reports.
The CBR is handled not just by Technical Moderators, but also members of the Alpha Test team, QA team and developers / designers team.
in that case those staffs in question need a new or better information course about how to identify sources and handle bug reports.
The solution to the issue cant be us begging actual tech mods, we have connections with to relook at the reports.
Thats one of the issues coming from anonymousing the handlers as well, since we cant directly tell them about their mistakes anymore either or discuss what was wrong with them.
Sadly many people were not doing that, rather using it to personally harass or target them instead.
Any member of the team can be contacted in case of a report potentially facing an issue.
You can also report a post itself on the CBR if you suspect its incorrect and needs a review:
another issue is the reports getting instantly closed,
if the comment section would be left actual open, we could discuss it there, or add them information / reports and wouldnt need to open X reports about the same matter
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/42TKQybSK2b2
We did like in this case . A maliciously done report by a french community member, already proven here in the forums to have misused sources to fit his narrative.
And being banned from the forums now already as well.
Reporting Iris-t as 50G as 50g max
From a Report whose main topic is safety and insensitive munitions
Reported manovers of 50g does not equal that the missle is capable of handling 50g max
And yet, it was not addressed at all from our issue reports or any statement done in the bug report and just implemented.
The communication is lacking
Sadly this is not practical. If every report already closed also had to be left open, it means there is a near infinite number of both new and existing reports open. It simply is impossible to monitor and continually revisit over and over already answered reports in this way. Its why when a report is closed, exactly why is provided so it can be corrected and submitted again (if its a mistake) or why its not an issue to begin with if not.
Further to that, once again:
These mechanism already are in place for situations like that.
Leaving reports open sadly is not a possible or practical solution.
As i said, we report stuff and it gets ignored. Very reassuring
Nothing has been ignored. The report you linked was answered and fixed. A new report can be submitted with valid sources if the information is correct.
When there are reports that are well over 3 years old at this point still sat “acknowledged” it is… concerning
In that regard try X for SLM max speed Community Bug Reporting System
I still dont see how iris-t slm should reach the 40km max, or the 30km, 12km altitude in 60s as reported by Diehl
so, no new about turret basket for the rest of mbts? you guys already forget about it?
You will get it when a certain nation Win Rate goes down
Sorry, Smin, may I ask if the Chinese new toptier Heli will get a new F&F IR ATGM?
Z-10ME now only has AKD10, and its BR is still 12.0, so it seems won’t get any new ATGM at this update?
Are you asking gaijin to nerf the challenger and ariete? Cause that’s just mean.
Little off topic, is there any American jet bomber that was supposed to, or really equip AN/M56?
I heard about 10,000lb bomb and 22,000lb bomb for XB-43 and B-45 respectively, but they were not in the game and don’t think to be added soon.
B-57A can’t carry AN/M56?
B-36, I guess.
The B-29 could get the VB-13, which half counts as it’s a guidance section attached to the Tallboy.
