Because an integrated defense suite exists? MAWS detects launch, RWR detects no radar, MAWS activates IR dome
Duh.
2 Likes
does it have a maw?
becuase i dont see it on the list
1 Like
If true then I highly stress the modeler should of saved his model before modeling the gun, why would he model the gunned variant first and then modeled the non gun variant.
As a efficient mind you would of thought to modeled the main frame and then the differences not just “oh one variant will do for now and try later”.
That just boggles my mind
Apparently so in-game atleast
This is straight from the dev server
But currently it’s useless without getting its CM’s which are also listed in that list
But also it’s IR jammer is a part of the AN/ALQ-211 SIRFC kit the Comanche SHOULD have. There’s a report up for a more advanced RWR found in that kit but nothing has come of it yet. If it should get that better RWR from the SIRFC kit then it should also get the rest of it added.
2 Likes
Why on earth would they give it a 25km range AGM?
Because we don’t currently have any plans for the non gun armed version. As I mentioned, its much more limited in its use and role. Given the L-39s current BR with a gun, one without is even more restricted and far less useful.
There were also other differences beyond just the gun.
1 Like
Computer graphics for video games does not work like this.
1 Like
Because L-39s definitely can’t carry gun pods or anything…
1 Like
Certain variants can.
Would you like to explain this?
1 Like
This smells like a 3rd party dev who modeled this aircraft too me since we also have aircraft without a gun in game but hey ho I’m gonna leave it here
means it aoutmaticly uses chaff for a radar missile, but isnt doing anything for IR ones
just tested it, it will not give you a warning for the ADATS in the test drive
That’s just because 99% of the time you can’t really meaningfully re-use or seriously modify a 3d model.
Easier to do it from scratch.
This is mostly applicable to games workflow.
1 Like
The ADATS doesn’t give a warning regardless of aircraft tested
Im not even sure what you mean by this. Nobody said we dont have aircraft without a gun. The question becomes how useful is a jet attacker that’s already at a low BR with a gun, when it does not have a gun at all.
It then enters BRs so low which Germany already has plenty of more practical aircraft to be used as attackers in.
So the focus was on the actual combat attacker variant that is most useful, being the ZA.
3 Likes
iam talking about a maw warning not rwr
just like an IR missile would, that was the point
Would you like to explain the sarcasm I used?
Not really.
And the ADATS is beam riding missile, it has a search radar and that’s it, the missile isn’t radar guided therefore no RWR warning other than the occasional ping of the search sweeps
the point is that it dosent have a MAW unlike what you stated earlier
what you posted just means that it automatically deploys chaff for radar missiles
1 Like