I’ve heard it was going to have guided weapons just worse, no kh29 or 1000kg. Also no all aspects just pl5b so that it goes down to su25 level pretty much.
120c changes
8 Likes
So slight seeker improvement? And a bit better range now after drag change.
1 Like
Gszabi found a Leo Major avatar. Wonder what it’s for(hopefully a permanent one) as it’s too early for next month’s avatar and datamines of those happen closer to them. There is one other way I could think of it, but it’s A weird as that is the wrong nation, and B I was hoping to skip it.
1 Like
THE GAUGES ARE EVEN IN DUTCH!!! I, as a true Dutchman approve of this awesome addition to the game!! 🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱🇳🇱
Now I can go to sleep in peace. Goedenacht allen! 🇳🇱
5 Likes
Now hopefully, you guys get some Dutch voice lines in this update.
2 Likes
ready for literally none of the british aircraft that can use SNIPER to be denied it for “balance”
realistically means there should be no reason to not add the C-5 to the Typhoon the F-15E was already one of the best BVR fighters
1 Like
I believe this is a nerf. Wider angle transmitter/receiver angles is akin to widening the seeker fov for an IR missile, just that with radar you can differentiate better between targets usually so it’s not a huge problem. Reference speed and range widths being widened, I think, means that you give the missile a larger range of speed and range (distance) values which are considered the intended target, so widening makes it easier for it to lock on the target if it changed parameters more, but also more likely to switch to an unintended target. But I am not completely sure about this one. I don’t think it has ever been clarified by a dev how the SARH/ARH mechanics work in-game.
Well anyway, these are the same values are pretty much every other ARH missile anyway, apart from the Phoenix/Fakour and MICA (which both get narrower transmitter/receiver angles).
Eh, i expect it to get fleshed out more eventually, its interesting to still see new stuff like that being worked on
Btw anyone know if we have new nation voice lines for this update by chance.
BVV_d said the F-2 would be getting it, didn’t say about anything else.
Smin what sets apart planes that can be given weapons/systems not used in service, but are compatible, and those which can not. Is it entirely just something for balance?
1 Like
Yeah, it’s fine for Finnish hornet to have 1280 BOL + 120 normal CM’s, but not OK for US one to have it, or even for US one to have ATFLIR. Meanwhile Swiss hornet gets a2g weaponry and it’s no issue at all
6 Likes
Its to make vehicles different he sorta explains it with the original 14.0 hornets and the EFT’s with their IRST
1 Like
I am curious as to how they will model it because if done right it will easily be the best TGP in game by a large margin. Which honestly would be Decent compensation for Japan not having great CAS options.
Now I am waiting for the US players to whine and get it it handed to them like they did with the 229 engines on the F-15E
4 Likes
Okay but then why no F-2 HMD, it has provisional modifications to be compatible with them, but it’s been denied. And there’s nothing unique it’s being compared with as its its own airframe.
1 Like
Couldn’t tell you, Finland didn’t get a good 14.0 because it would take away from the US. I mean the worst 14.0 hornet now is in an even worse spot lol. Id say its just gaijin being gaijin like their hate towards the type 81 for some reason
One thing I’ve found is Gaijin just wants to do their own thing. All these bug reports are there for Gaijin to use as justification when it suits them but when the details don’t, they just ignore them because at the end of the day it’s their game
2 Likes