Major Update "Leviathans" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 3)

Game Discussion General Discussion
3323

Ahh yes the UK is famous for its currently thriving automobile industry…

Brimstone dimensions; 1.8 x 0.18m
CAMM-ER dimensions; 4.2 x 0.19m

I’m sure you see the issue here.

On a less sarky note, you wouldn’t fit a CAMM launcher capable of CAMM, CAMM-ER and potentially CAMM-MR on gravehawk.

Would rather we bought a MAN or a Volvo basis than tried and failed and wasted money on making our own. I would like to see us involve JCB more though where possible, they’re the 3rd (formerly 1st :( ) largest heavy machinery manufacturer for a reason.

3324

i dont see

3325

I will enjoy saying I told you so to the people defending that abysmal IFV and waste of cash.

1 Like
3326

So yeah I’m gonna grind the F-2 lol

1 Like
3327

Its probably got a placeholder FM.

1 Like
3328

Nah. We’ll be able to fit a CAMM-MR into a classic mini

3329

they changed how all APFDDS rounds behave

image
image1019×86 37.9 KB

they did adjustments to the drag and weight of all the APFSDS rounds and the M829A1 actually got a buff
image

3330

And they still havent actioned Flames year old bug report for L27A1

1 Like
3331

2 whole mm of pen extra.

The M829 is getting a serious nerf, but it’s not the top round anymore on any vehicle so it doesn’t really matter.

1 Like
3332

It’s not, it has stuff like MLC modeled differently then the F-16, and the raw figures on it are different.

I do have a bug report accepted on some stuff wrong with it, but it’s just stuff that would make it better. It’s current performance is very close to expected aside from compressing way way too much.

It does have like, 1 square meter of extra wing area then it should, but that’s not going to noticably make it much worse.

7 Likes
3333

Actually scratch the ‘IFV’ part, I forgot 50% of the reason its so abysmal is that its not an IFV, they didn’t make an ifv variant…

Best you get is a shoddy APC with a .50 cal. Rather than a full on IFV with a 40mm turret and 7 dismounts

3334

Then it will need to be moved to 14.0 then.

3335

Its literally like the third or fourth worse 13.7, it’s much closer to needing moving down to 13.3 then it is moving up.

Turn fighting should not dictate the BR of stuff alone, or else the Ki-27 would be 14.0.

5 Likes
3336

For the past 6 months i’ve heard nothing but “Typhoon is the best gunfighter in the game therefore it doesnt need any buffs or bug fixes”

So its nice to finally find someone who realises that dogfight performance means bugger all at top tier

3337

wrong 2.62mm of extra pe, which we can round up to 3mm of extra pen, which sounds like a pretty serious buff to me /s

2 Likes
3338

Typhoon isn’t only “one of the best gunfighters” though, that thing is also one of the few planes that can somwhat keep up with the F-15E/I (pre update, so only AIM-120B) in bvr.

3339

Id agree with you, if its radar wasnt a placeholder/complete buggy mess. BOL had been fixed and a few other issues.

Still awaiting the CAPTOR-M to be modeled and with the amount of things getting AESA. Its probably about time it gets AESA too.

3340

It’s not like the F-15E/I radar is that special/solid. Everything I’ve dealt with using the EFT radar I’ve also dealt with using the F-15E/I radar to some extend (less in some aspects, but worse in others) ever since they introduced TWS+.

There is only 1 plane with an ESA radar equiped plane that can somewhat do long range BVR, the Su-30SM. So again the EFT is not alone in this aspect.

1 Like
3341

if Typhoon is denied AIm-120C5s, then CAPTOR-E would be the fair alternative

3342

TWO WHOLE MILIMETER
like thats gonna pen anything more significant
also
ONLY the one w larger differences are below
which mean that M829 is still a nerf
u cant convince me anything buddy