With PW4 on other typhoons there really isn’t a good reason. Should get them like F-15E should get it’s dual mode bombs
Actually facts it would pair with the Australian f-18
Point still stands. Only Britain uses PW4s and yet they were added to the other 2 nations that didnt use them. And yet Britian is denied the 1000lb GPS+Laser bomb that is already on the other 2.
Rather unfair if you ask me.
Anyway. The Typhoon needs AGM-65, AGM-130 and GBU-39 equivalents added to it ASAP
Gaijin back to censoring posts.
Could the mod contact me and discuss what I said wrong when Gaijin don’t care about balance? Do you think it’s balanced to add new features to only half the nations in game?
If it’s so tiny why are you against it when it’s just putting an existing weapon in game. Implementation takes 0 effort too since it just goes where 2000lb go
1 Like
Yeah that’s what I said, I’m agreeing with you it doesn’t make sense
Sweet. So MMW Brimstone and GPS- Spear-3s
1 Like
Yeah for sure. But they aren’t really equivalent to anything you listed. MMW Brimstone and SPEAR 3 is much more modern than AGM-65, 130, or even first generation SDB
They’d probably just be a higher BR but now with better AA why not add peak
Because as soon as you get this you’ll just move to the next thing.
Just look at all your “rah US is the best”, “US plane X should also get [insert] because plane X in other nations also gets it”, “US totally wouldn’t have a worse version of their jet than other nations irl” and other examples.
This is why a lot of people are starting to hate US mains, and rightfully so.
3 Likes
Maybe because there are a bunch of other issues to move onto
Or maybe because US used/tested it and it really makes no sense to withhold when it clearly is not a balance concern
2 Likes
Not every nation needs everything they tested. Because as soon as players from other nations start requesting hight tier US vehicles for their nations that they tested, you’ll be the first to deny them those to “keep US top tier unique” and tell them to “just grind the US tree”.
1 Like
Not talking about vehicles.
The problem with that line is that an accurate Brimstone would be enough and there wouldn’t be a need for SPEAR 3 at this time. The UK spent a long time developing and perfecting Brimstone for the in game representation to be subpar.
1 Like
Yeah because you will just move the goalpost whenever necessary, it’s just what a lot of nation mains do.
I don’t think this is on topic, so I’ll just end my part of the argument with this.
1 Like
SPEAR 3 is basically future proofing for better AA from my understanding
Brother lives and breaths the words MMW brimstone
Hey, imagine if the best weapon you had was Vikhrs and yet KH-29 and KH-38 existed but was denied because it “was too OP” and yet other nations had equal or superior weapons
Would hte SU-30 with only Vikhrs vs Rafale with AASM be fair?
1 Like
I think in game though it would act like a JASSM
it wont be that powerful it is still very slow.
I think of it like a GBU-53 that doesn’t need much altitude to be dropped due to its engine. Allows user to stay lower