Sweet. So MMW Brimstone and GPS- Spear-3s
1 Like
Yeah for sure. But they aren’t really equivalent to anything you listed. MMW Brimstone and SPEAR 3 is much more modern than AGM-65, 130, or even first generation SDB
They’d probably just be a higher BR but now with better AA why not add peak
Because as soon as you get this you’ll just move to the next thing.
Just look at all your “rah US is the best”, “US plane X should also get [insert] because plane X in other nations also gets it”, “US totally wouldn’t have a worse version of their jet than other nations irl” and other examples.
This is why a lot of people are starting to hate US mains, and rightfully so.
3 Likes
Maybe because there are a bunch of other issues to move onto
Or maybe because US used/tested it and it really makes no sense to withhold when it clearly is not a balance concern
1 Like
Not every nation needs everything they tested. Because as soon as players from other nations start requesting hight tier US vehicles for their nations that they tested, you’ll be the first to deny them those to “keep US top tier unique” and tell them to “just grind the US tree”.
1 Like
Not talking about vehicles.
The problem with that line is that an accurate Brimstone would be enough and there wouldn’t be a need for SPEAR 3 at this time. The UK spent a long time developing and perfecting Brimstone for the in game representation to be subpar.
1 Like
Yeah because you will just move the goalpost whenever necessary, it’s just what a lot of nation mains do.
I don’t think this is on topic, so I’ll just end my part of the argument with this.
1 Like
SPEAR 3 is basically future proofing for better AA from my understanding
Brother lives and breaths the words MMW brimstone
Hey, imagine if the best weapon you had was Vikhrs and yet KH-29 and KH-38 existed but was denied because it “was too OP” and yet other nations had equal or superior weapons
Would hte SU-30 with only Vikhrs vs Rafale with AASM be fair?
1 Like
I think in game though it would act like a JASSM
it wont be that powerful it is still very slow.
I think of it like a GBU-53 that doesn’t need much altitude to be dropped due to its engine. Allows user to stay lower
Flying low wont protect you from the level of SAMs we have in game.
It makes pop up attacks easier and quicker since you don’t have to climb as much
Not really as we will still have to use GPS guidance and as Gaijin wont add MMW the difference is we can drop them from far away and have enough to saturate an area.
Regarding the introduction of a new rank to naval my question is if the multipliers for events are going to change because this means that top rank coastal will no longer have the reward for being top rank to the score if they keep it being the top 2 ranks.
1 Like
Depends on the map
Maybe from SLAMRAAM but not the 9X or IRIS-T