ADATS with its 70+ degree azimuth radar, radar performance, auto-lead missiles, 85 degree missiles elevation, sight stabilization, multi track, TWS, IRST lock range, IRST lock capability in adverse weather, with all of them missing
yeah man i wish gaijin would be competence
I’m also happy to hear that Bvvd also thinks the F-2 is a “slower but more agile F-16” so at least the devs don’t plan to make it a “fat f-16”
1 Like
Would you guys think that would be good addition to new interface?
1 Like
Once again, no auto lead
So what exactly is the reason for C5s on jets now lol
1 Like
Can’t have auto lead, it would make SAMs too stronk
Spoiler
/jk if you couldnt tell
100% they have also done ADATS dirty. And now the US don’t need it so it will never have these features added.
Yeah, I feel that…
So, what time after ru stream does dev open? an hour? a day?
You really won’t need to defend against these threats. They are short range compared to the majority of ordnance, static targets so GPS/Laser guided ordnance could generally be used, and we will not see the seeker remotely require any other form of CM. If you are engaged, it was user error.
cant find a word for “the missiles knows where it is, the missiles find its way into the laser beam”
For now:
3 Likes
Line Of Sight Beam Riding
1 Like
got it boss
what did he say?
The missile already does that, so just skip that point
Also i wonder if they modeled IRIS-T seeker being immune to DIRCM, need to hop in against a Ka-52 in dev.
Well you see, American kit was just underperforming so heavily they needed the new missiles. (They didn’t, their stuff was already excessively potent, but they cried so they get new kit)
1 Like
Blue winrates below 70%.
lmk whe, ive been curious about this too, i got the ka52