Asking for Romanian L-39ZA)
Is someone already working on a detailed report about the problems of the Sovetsky Souyz?? It’s currently even buffed compared to the Soviet design. Here’s where I’ve written down all the issues in Russian for now. Unfortunately, I can’t make the report myself. Feel free to message me privately if you have any questions.
7 Likes
@Stona_WT the F/A-18C MLU 2 for Sweden and the Bismarck are missing in the new vehicles list.
1 Like
behind the T90M, but rank 8.
Yea let see how long that thing stay near 8.7 for naval battles.
This is an intriguing concept, it gives me ideas for mission design.
I would like to know, will the preexisting WW2 -themed maps that had aircraft carriers now use the high detail ones added in update Apex Predators ? Or are they just being used on the revised maps in this changelog ?
I don’t know if its been mentioned yet, but they gave the KH38ML/MT GNSS now. They pretty much just doubled down on keeping the KH38MT in the game. Very balanced AGM.
10 Likes
Impossible, i’ve been told that Russia suffers and the Su-30 underperforms at anything it does.
the sharp contrast between forum’s gaslight and actual game stats is absurd.
“Guys! But other people said so!”
This isn’t an issue of the Su-30SM, which does play a role in the bigger issue, but the issue is in the Kh-38MT. It’s an IR guided AGM with far too much range that has come under scrutiny for being paper, Gaijin initially doubling down and giving it to the Su-30SM and Su-34, which are a strike aircraft and fighter respectively, thus not effecting eachother’s SP cost, is the major issue. Gaijin refuses to remove it, but rather chooses to give an already fake missile things it never had.
“Forum’s Gaslight” is commonly where bug fixes come from, and even then ingame stats will shoe you just how much the Kh-38MT overperforms. The Su-30SM might not do well in ARB, but it is disgusting in ground
(Sorry if you were using sarcasm and I just completely overlooked it, I’m horrible at picking up on tone in text)
5 Likes
What? That gotta be photoshopped right?
Such as the SLAMRAAM?
2 Likes
Fr slamraam still has 9X
No they have GNSS now
My god… Why?! This is so unfair now. There are literally no docs about dual mode kh38 crap, only separate versions
For anyone that doesnt know what that means - they can shoot without ANY LINE OF SIGHT AT ALL, they can shoot behind a hill literally making it LOAL.
Absolute fkn bias. FnF brimstones got rejected cuz of that but kh38 hell no. They even ignored 9k reply thread like it was nothing and proceed to buff without any proof. GJ to whoever modeled that
7 Likes
Since we are getting a much needed SPAA update, can someone nudge the devs to give the older SPAA their CLOS automatic guidance modes?
They should operate like SARH but u cant notch or chaff the missile, at least for rolands.
@Smin1080p_WT
Sorry to bother but youre the main man 😅
I cant download the client if the site is down, been trying for 3 hours now.
Doesn’t even benefit the MT, ML however
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/VmDVm6m2gZxP
1 Like
I took all the screenshots, the ones without GNSS listed are from the War Thunder Wiki, the ones with GNSS listed is from the dev server.
1 Like
Pretty sure all Kh-38 missiles regardless of seeker head has GNSS guidance? It’s not exactly useful for the IR guided one unless the target literally sits there while it’s fired in POINT but for laser guided one yeah that’s a neat buff to have
There was a whole discussion about it, however the export company did list a version without the sat guidance as an option.
https://roe.ru/production/aviatsionnaya-tekhnika-i-vooruzhenie-vozdushno-kosmicheskikh-sil/aviatsionnye-sredstva-porazheniya/upravlyaemye-sredstva-porazheniya/aviatsionnye-upravlyaemye-rakety-obshchego-naznacheniya-klassa-vozdukh-poverkhnost/kh-38mle/?theme=theme-lightblue
1 Like