So it turns out I was lying (or checking lied to me) and it does actually show the names of some platforms.
(Do not question the weaponload)
On the tornado GR4
So should be in the UKs arsenal.
Really annoying
Think they were asking where they were on the pommie EFT, if in the pommie tree, yea. Gr4 got snazzy kit.
If only Brimstone’s were useful against convoys like they meant to be :(
Yeah…
Sad GR4
su-30sm crt 51 types
3 Likes
AV-8B Night Attack and AV-8B+ (USMC & MM) missing GBU-32(V)2/B JDAM
- AV-8B Night Attack
- AV-8B+ (USMC)
- AV-8B+ (MM)
Don’t forget to A-10C, F-16C Block 50 and F-16AM Block 15 MLU lack GBU-54(V)1/B Laser JDAM
- A-10C
- F-16C Block 50
- F-16AM Block 15 MLU
F-14A Early 70’s pre AIM-9M service
Personally, F-14A late 1984 - 2005 armed AIM-9M
4 Likes
They might have come with F-15E I think. Funny because out of all the laser+gps bomb carriers I think the strike eagle has used the greatest variety of them. even the GBU-39, which were added as its gimmick armament, have a laser+gps version.
they do that a lot
@Smin1080p_WT How is this a suggestion, when it beeing SAP beeing simply wrong and not even remotely true to Historic Evidence.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/IXxAlK3TPCJQ
And mine which was then classed as duplicate.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/UhQz7Rib4Kkt
Hello.
As you can see by th first report, it does include sources and also states “I suggest to simply use” as part of the report. So it’s correct as a suggestion.
What
Yeah, because it can be implemented in multible forms correctly instead of SAP (which is wrong), because the game currently doesnt have APCIHE-T (US Report APC/I/HE/Tracer), it can be simply APHE-T again as it was on first DEV, or like the 35mm API-T which also has a HE filler. That he wrote “i suggest” is simply a way of writing. But noted, ill continue forwart with It Must be instead of i suggest in my reports.
Its not a suggestion that other types are better, but a report that SAP is simply wrong. Its performance should be better than the normal APHE-T (not in game, but same hull as the AP-I) not worse and simply not A SemiAP round.
Are there news about the torgue converter for the luchs A2 aswell? IIRC a bug report god passed a month ago
It’s not simply about the wording. The report itself is suggesting a change.
A bug is an unintended issue or something not by intention.
Any updates would typically be reflected in the comments or status of the report.
Because its wrong. But then everything would be a suggestion.
From my understanding:
Suggestion → could be better
Report → is wrong
And this is simply clearly wrong.
It was chsnged from APHE-T to SAPHEI-T, with reduced penetration, however that is wrong, there isnt even any evidence for it to be SAP, IRl it was an improvement, with increased penetration, not reduced.
The reporting system seems highly flawed, not to mention the unknowlegeble Moderators that dont understand the difference between APC and APBC and close the report, among others.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/0xpBi5kKhldl
And putting it clearly im told “not to argue with the moderators” im not arguing im just correcting their false info.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/M0eBfZy5PQ80
And the calculator could be used, because SAP is simply wrong.
2 Likes
let’s try this again… the community bug reporting is highly flawed, I am STILL waiting for some kind of response about roof mounted MGs not working correctly.
The report is about SAPHEI-T being an incorrect designation.
The only time I mention “I suggest” is when I say:
I suggest to simply use the combined filler of 5.2g PETN and 6g Thermite as explosive filler of 11.2 PETN & Thermite, to reduce the armor penetration of the shell by also considering the Thermite filler and not just the explosive filler.
TNT equivalent could be put to 1.0 bringing up the TNT equivalent to 11.2g from the current 8.84g from the 5.2g PETN alone.
While what SHOULD be changed is written as:
→ Change the shell from SAPHEI-T back to APHE-T (or APHEI-T)
In this report I state that the French 7.5mm aircraft and ground MGs are missing an AP-T bullet, which is identical to the Tracer already in the game, except using a hardened steel core.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/mb2RILVnj8Je
Yet, again the report is submitted as suggestion.
How does that make any sense?
Both instances are historical inaccuries. Yet they are treated as suggestions.
This would be incorrect.
A bug is something unintentionally occuring or happening. Something not by design. Such as a technical issue with Graphics, gameplay etc.
A suggestion is anything source or opinion subjective.
Regardless, this report has already been forwarded.
1 Like