Still more than the US currently. Looks like only laser+gps jet in whole US will be 14.0 hornet with LJDAM once update drops.
Doesn’t make any sense since we put laser+gps on everything from F-35 to F-117’s
Don’t remember when these combined guidance things showed up, but might not be on the yank platforms if they came in beforehand. Know that without a fuss, it’s hard to get new weapons on compatible aircraft even if it’s the update bringing it.
Where 2000lb gps bomb??
Poof Gone
Pommies don’t have them.
This may well be the case, doesn’t change that it is not present on the pommie EFT.
So it turns out I was lying (or checking lied to me) and it does actually show the names of some platforms.
(Do not question the weaponload)
On the tornado GR4
So should be in the UKs arsenal.
Really annoying
Think they were asking where they were on the pommie EFT, if in the pommie tree, yea. Gr4 got snazzy kit.
If only Brimstone’s were useful against convoys like they meant to be :(
Yeah…
Sad GR4
su-30sm crt 51 types
2 Likes
AV-8B Night Attack and AV-8B+ (USMC & MM) missing GBU-32(V)2/B JDAM
- AV-8B Night Attack
- AV-8B+ (USMC)
- AV-8B+ (MM)
Don’t forget to A-10C, F-16C Block 50 and F-16AM Block 15 MLU lack GBU-54(V)1/B Laser JDAM
- A-10C
- F-16C Block 50
- F-16AM Block 15 MLU
F-14A Early 70’s pre AIM-9M service
Personally, F-14A late 1984 - 2005 armed AIM-9M
3 Likes
They might have come with F-15E I think. Funny because out of all the laser+gps bomb carriers I think the strike eagle has used the greatest variety of them. even the GBU-39, which were added as its gimmick armament, have a laser+gps version.
they do that a lot
@Smin1080p_WT How is this a suggestion, when it beeing SAP beeing simply wrong and not even remotely true to Historic Evidence.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/IXxAlK3TPCJQ
And mine which was then classed as duplicate.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/UhQz7Rib4Kkt
Hello.
As you can see by th first report, it does include sources and also states “I suggest to simply use” as part of the report. So it’s correct as a suggestion.
What
Yeah, because it can be implemented in multible forms correctly instead of SAP (which is wrong), because the game currently doesnt have APCIHE-T (US Report APC/I/HE/Tracer), it can be simply APHE-T again as it was on first DEV, or like the 35mm API-T which also has a HE filler. That he wrote “i suggest” is simply a way of writing. But noted, ill continue forwart with It Must be instead of i suggest in my reports.
Its not a suggestion that other types are better, but a report that SAP is simply wrong. Its performance should be better than the normal APHE-T (not in game, but same hull as the AP-I) not worse and simply not A SemiAP round.
Are there news about the torgue converter for the luchs A2 aswell? IIRC a bug report god passed a month ago