Will we keep getting more drop tanks for existing aircraft families this update or the next? I like this for custom loadouts, cinematics, and general LARPing.
3 Likes
any update on a200c maw pod? additionally are we going to get the lizards and other EGBUs?
Could you help me to find those sources from where the devs justify the changes on the EF g limit, AoA, thrust to weight ratio and Flight performance changes in general? Please.
Also, can you help me to find the same sources that support the rafale in-game flight model to be able to reach mach 2?
Edit: Also, you stated that “All changes are based on sources or historical information” there is a lot of sources and historical information abount brimstones fnf capabilities, but in game it is different.
I know the brimstone thing isnt a subject of this update (should be fixed though) but that´s what happens when you let issues sink another issues, I mean, BI stills at 6.7 and that thing is from 2020, when I started again to play this.
Thank you for your time and I really hope only for the sources of the EF and the Rafale, thank you.
great! thanks for all your reports bro
i hope they will implement my reports
no need to say thank you, i do it for the community.
1 Like
How are these guided without a pod ingame? Do they just guide to a target point designated in third person?
a video on youtube can explain better than me for sure
Could you help me to find those sources from where the devs justify the changes on the EF g limit, AoA, thrust to weight ratio and Flight performance changes in general? Please.
Also, can you help me to find the same sources that support the rafale in-game flight model to be able to reach mach 2?
Also, I see that in the bunderswehr page the top speed of EF2000 is 2.35M, so there we need a better way to get something that can be used in-game, not just “realistic or balance” but a mix of both, and that should be accepted for the community instead of just implementing it and then change it (turret basket for example)
Thank you for your time and I really hope only for the sources of the EF and the Rafale, thank you.
1 Like
I hope with the F/A-18C getting GBU-54s the F-16C and F-15E can finally get them as well at some point.
GPS weapons can be targeted without pod. But if it has laser, they add target pod so you can use the laser targeting functionality, even if you don’t plan on it. “Activate target point” gives you a position that it will strive to hit, with or without a pod.
1 Like
Just figured they would maintain the hard requirement for a tpod thats all. Interesting they allow some aircraft to run gps guided weapons without a tpod.
F16C → can utilise GBU 39 and 38 without pod
F15E → ^
F15C → can utilise GBU 31 without pod
EFT → cannot utilise gps without pod
Su30 SM → Can utilise all bar the laser guided ones without TPOD.
Jas 39 → Can utilise all GPS weapons without pod
Rafale → Can utilise GPS weapons without targeting pod*
M2KD-RMV → Can utilise GPS weapons without targeting pod
Ignored attackers with in built targeting systems.
*Rafale does kind of have an inbuilt targeting system but I have no clue what to class this as
Make of this information what you will, I don’t know how to make a chart in this forum thing.
This is why I assumed it was a hard requirement. Tornado Gr4 with built in FLIR, needs TPod with all GPS weapons
But why would GPS guided stuff even need a TGP?
Wonder if it’s an attacker limitation. Would be very odd, but not the first odd thing in this game
To designate the target without being able to “punch GPS coordinates in manually”
Maybe they let F-15 and F-16 do this since they are able to “punch in” coordinates straight from cockpit, while Gr4 may need to do it through pod or something.
EFT suffers the targeting pod limitation as well. I find this dubious cause at best.