No
Currently Ef pull 26.X degree AOA only
After nerf it would be max 24.X AOA
No even close to EF irl
1 Like
There’s no reason why a feature such as the NCTR won’t get added soon enough to a plane given the nature of the feature itself.
It still doesn’t change the glaring fact that it took less than 5 minutes to accept a suggestion with a single document, while there has been tons of documented, and well elaborated reports that has been ignored or outright dismissed by sheer ‘Game convention, not a bug’ resolution.
1 Like
The Harrier suffers far worse but the silly part is I can see gaijin nerfing the eft to be on par with SU30 and F-15
The continue to artificially nerf so many planes based on their own personal opinion
Except it did not get added, it was forwarded to the Developers for consideration, I’ve said it before. Can you read?
The single document in question is Saab themselves, it is a primary source, like every other report with a primary source, it gets forwarded, the number of documents here have no impact.
4 Likes
Hey, can you elaborate on the reasoning behind this verdict?
I disagree with it, because if the F-14s had this feature historically then it is by definition a bug.
3 Likes
I’ve got some umm primary sources but they where not fixed even after this next update claimed to fix them
If it was forwarded, it’ll certainly be added, as the feature currently exists, and it won’t be a gamechanger by itself. Your argument is closer to an euphemism than anything else.
Edit: unsuprisingly, it got swiftly added.
This primary source thing has been a convenient argument ever since the game’s beginnings. Don’t even bother me with that. Even @Apollo_1641 is forwarding you with an example of how that rule has inconsistencies.
Ok, what’s about Klimov RD-33 and RD-93 missing thrust? Why JF-17 got 1700 km/h speed instead of 1900 km/h?
Would you be interested in making a post for me?
I have multiple primary sources for the type 10 and tons of people interested in seeing this thing come to life
Better modeling by proper sizing
Better armor characteristics (not op just increasing it by 1.4 times the current amount
Equals to 791 for either turret cheek, 620 for the UFP all current weaknesses would remain the same)
Basically a more correct and balanced version of the type 10 and TKX
I wish that was the case.
Need it on the Tornados too
1 Like
There is no argument here, Technical Moderator Job is to forward issues to Developers, JAS39 NCTR issue was created while I was online- I forwarded it.
Reports with Primary Sources can be forwarded as always, after a report has been forwarded it is up to Developers.
I can see only one report about RD-93 missing thrust, such reports cannot be forwarded because those thrust values are uninstalled one- we need installed ones.
3 Likes
Aye.
On many planes. That’s why I have full understanding if there’s limited dev resources or not enough time, but at the same time I think it’s wrong to reject valid reports for that reason.
It would be better to label them as “accepted - will be implemented later” or something like that, so we know it’s coming when the devs can get around to it.
4 Likes
Yeah, “forwarded as a suggestion” i think would have been tha appropriate tag.
But “nah, we cant be bothered to add it to any other aircraft at this time”
is kinda BS
6 Likes
All of the relivant reports for this were nudged. At the moment, sadly there is no new news.
3 Likes
It wont have any more chances of getting accepted if i made it compared to you, i get no preferential treatment. Additionally i don’t know enough about the Type 10 to put my name behind a report to any reasonable degree.
Are there still suprises when the update releases or did we see everything?
What about the one I posted?
@Smin1080p_WT On the topic of bug reports any chance you could bump this report I just made for the F/A-18’s. Currently they are missing the radar lock box on the HUD for TWS soft locks. Other elements of the radar track are present including a small dot that seems to be showing the targets current orientation and direction relative to you. The box is present when you hard lock a target.
All F/A-18’s missing TWS lock box on HUD
The issue wasn’t present during the first Dev Server after it had opened, it only appeared after either the second or third update to the Dev Server.
As a sidenote, please respect the mods… they put in tons of work to forward issues and constantly work to make the game better.
14 Likes