again an independent tt is an option, just like united korea is also an option, and at the end of the day.
The us doesnt need a tech tree.
Claim number 1 for argument 1. I want SK vehicles because I want to see the added additionally they could help the US tech tree which is the only place they could go.
Claim 2 for argument 2. This one is me disagreeing because Israel doesn’t even start at rank one
America should just be a Sub-TT for a Mexico :P
1 Like
Israel is really pushing it already for the bottom limit of TT size imo. SK would simply be too small to be a full tree. if its united korea, it just completely screws matchmaking
1 Like
Mexico subtree for Texas
1 Like
And I think i’m the rage baiter lol. I’m not rage baiting about the sub tree though
Argentine F-16s for Britain :P
not really, china is a similar scenario of western and eastern equipment, and as for the lenght of the tech tree only the air force would be lacking, the ground foces would be fine if you also add north korea, and you also have the option of indonisia as a sub for them, which seems to have a rather close military relationship.
But doesn’t the US and SK have a closer relationship?
1 Like
so instead of just adding it as US subtree, it should be added as an independent tree by fusing another nation to it, and then giving that a subtree? seems like a whole lot more work for same end result
1 Like
not really the same result, as sub tech trees are most of the times quite limited on the equipment that they introduce, no sub tech tree has anywhere close to the same amout of vehicles that israel has gotten for example, even if you discount all the magachs, and adding an extra tt would also introduce north korean ground forces which also have plenty of unique vehicles, btw the hypothetically sub tt that i propose would come later on.
I think there should be an update we’re NK and SK are added to United States and the Soviet Union. Boom problem solved. (this is a bad joke)
But still the US should get SK it would add a lot to the Us and we’ll get SK tanks and jets.
1 Like
well, tbf there are only a couple really notable SK vehicles. K-2, K-9, F-15K, KF-21, and T-50 off the top of my head.
the rest would just be US copy paste for air and ground (to lower extent iirc)
1 Like
NK subtree would be interesting for USSR tbh. historically and vehicle wise it makes sense.
It would just be modernized copy paste
for newer stuff it becomes indigenous. but for earlier stuff yeah. so they could get away with not adding it or adding it as a skin and it wouldnt matter since its already in USSR
2 Likes
Most of the copy paste is mainly found on the lower tiers in the case of the ground forces, and as for the airforce it is mostly copy paste
1 Like
idk i see a lot of US tanks on that list (from SK). and a lot of stuff derived from US equipment or license made ones.
United korea is a horrible idea, it would ruin sim make balancing pain. Make them the strongest in air arcade and air simulator due to them having the best of both worlds. The cherry on top is that they hate each other
Again the two chinas are in the same tt in the game, thats not much of an argument.