Considering another nation got a british capital ship without representation, that’s something i will and will continue to complain about
2 Likes
And you’re free to do so, who’s gonna stop you?
My name is quite literally all nation enjoyer for a reason. I’m one of the least biased people on the platform.
I literally play USA and have their tech trees to rank 8.
As if this is the all determing factor to air engagements, get real.
What?
Implying what, that I’m wrong in that thread? lmao
2 Likes
I would argue it would have been nice to have gotten the EFT and Rafale alongside the F-15E
Yes, but when I see threads like “ABRAMS NEEDS MASSIVE BUFFS BECAUSE MERICA!!!” I just cant help but laugh at US mains. They already the second or third strongest MBT in game at the moment.
You arent following what Im saying. We got HMS Hood 3 years ago at this point, and we only jsut got Rodney and Warspite to augment her properly. In the same amount of time, US got 4 or 5 battleships. It was rather BS the distribution of ships and given everyone is still weaker than the Scharnhorst. there can be no claims of “baalncing concerns”
I havent seen a signle Brit main complain about that. We were all complaining about the lack of BOL of the T.10, which we won by the way. Most were quite excited and rather happy for the T.10 because most rather hated the decision to add Aim-9Ms to the GR7. This “fixes” that.
A CF-18 could still be an interesting filler. But Im happy with what I got. Im more mad that the EFT radar didnt get the TLC it actually needed
1 Like
Whenever i do people act as if im asking the world when in reality all im after is a british built class where its supposed to be, no disrespect meant but sometimes making a stereotype which many here do tends to get incredibly frustrating
1 Like
There’s a typo in it then, *AllNationEnjoyer_ExceptMajorOnes
Same, we got something in common at least.
Bring down the F/A-18C then, it seems the only justification for it being at 14.0 is missile count, again, “get real”.
Maybe you can develop a bit there?
Also, you missed that in your reply :
Yeah, the lack of a Revenge-Class in the British TT is a tad annoying. Though at least we did get something else and not simply nothing, that would have made me really mad
I play all nations, I enjoy all nations. You are arrogant as hell to try to claim otherwise lmao.
I think I’d know? My name doesn’t mean I don’t call out problems with the game though, such as the imbalance at 8.3-8.7 in air.
I am not speaking on the hornet.
What? You realize if someone doesn’t know what you’re talking about, it’s not always their fault, sometimes its your inane rambling? lmao
It certainly is. As a US main i surely know what stereotypes are, when you are one people just assume you want the F-35A block II with Aim-260 and god knows what. When in reality I’m sure most US mains here are satisfied with what they have.
I think your claim is justified honestly. I want the Royal Navy to be best represented in game as much as I want the US Air Force to be. As they say, Britannia rules the waves huh?
Honestly its more i want to make a lineup purely of ship classes that fought at jutland which currently i cant so
Indeed, all the primary threads about UK air this dev was about the Harriers. As all you guys wanted was for the T.10 to be playable, and as many fixes to the others ones as possible.
And on the Commonwealth Hornet, well most of you guys wouldn’t mind, the minority asking for one are from the Commonwealth nation in question it’s from.
1 Like
Says the guy who spawned in the forum to call me a clown… You are arrogant for thinking you’ve got the “superior opinion”. You just go there and say I want stuff for the US when I never said anything like that.
Do you just go around and put words in the mouths of people like that? A strawman won’t save you.
You say the same stuff all over again and try to paint me as a fool when you are the one doing this.
What’s even your point in this argument? That the US as a Nation should be deleted from the game?
It’s literally hard to know what you mean through your posts.
I Honestly don’t know what cannot be understood here, as for the “insane rambling”, you are posting in this forum without even knowing what you are argumenting for, is this a joke of some kind?
I feel like you are argumenting with the Idea of a US Main that wants his tree to be better than everyone else’s, which I clearly am not, but you wouldn’t know that because you have trouble reading my posts correctly it seems.
I’m pretty sure both of us are annoying the whole forum, don’t you wanna take it to private messages? That way you can say nonsense directly to me and not spam the thread?
So uh new thread when?
1 Like
yeah, again, not what I said, I said it was unfitting to you though you went and made it clear it actually was
where did I say I have the “superior opinion”
like you’re doing rn?
When Pacifica made Next major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion ?
Did I ever say the US was not good enough and I wanted better stuff? You’re yet to answer that btw.
You’re speaking as if you know me.
If you’re gonna go around and put words in the mouths of people, it might aswell happen to you. Except you did call me a clown, and the fact you were so disrespectful in your first post is the whole reason we’re still here.
Why couldn’t you just have handled it calmly at first and we could have just discussed that? The initial disagreement was that British mains complained.
You forgot what your inital argument was for, this discussion serves literally no purpose, can we stop now?
only after the fact :), after you got angry and started flaming when I basically said “this is not befitting of you”
when update finished?
current game isn’t fully updated
Because clowning my own image doesn’t have clowing myself as a consequence, what was even “my image” at first, do you know me?
Sure… Now if you’re willing to stop let’s do this.
How could you know it was not “befitting of me”, that’s my question.
And again this is useless, we either discuss the cause of the disagreement or stop, we’re just getting personal here.
I gave you the benefit of the doubt.