Major Update "Hornet Sting" - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 5)

Very mature, I can see clown actually just IS your personality so good day lmao

That’s all it ever is, forum is full of tribals.

Su-27 is F-15A equal bud, not superior.

You can add leclerc to that

No. This is a video game made to be BALANCED.

Makes zero sense as an argument while you complain about not getting enough as USA, who gets multiple jets a PATCH on average

2 Likes

Not at all, I definitely agree with you there. I want British players to get their aicrafts too. What I’m saying is no aircrafts could have been added to “fix” British top tier, because it would either be too mid or too OP. So the complaining was pointless, as much as it is now.

The F/A-18 surely wasn’t going to get added before the F-15. Now wouldn’t you agree that it would have been nice for the US to have gotten the F/A-18C alongside the EF-2000 to have even a semblance of hope agaisnt an EF-2000 or a Rafale, in a dogfight, not even in BVR which is what ARB is all about now.

It certainly isn’t. But both of our top tier tanks have issues, so why should we bring down the other nation instead of just trying to “unite” and get it fixed? That what a lot of the British mains do here, put their tree above everything else, and that’s what I’m agaisnt.

Well it goes the same of the Royal Navy too. US Air is strong and has a lot of aircrafts, yes. But it doesn’t have the Best aircraft anymore. Which again I’ve stated I am fine with. I want other nations to get ahold of Superiority this year before the F-22 and the other 5th Gens that are really close because after that it’s just gonna be USA on top for A WHILE.

Well here we go! I knew you were sane lol. I Think Britain Air right now is very strong, and I am happy for them. Sure we all have some issues or bugs in our trees, for you it’s the Harrier, for us it’s the Aim-54C underperforming etc… But I just don’t get the British mains complaining they got nothing for air this update…

Can probably add any MBT other than the Leopard 2s at this point

Yeah… US is the last nation that should be complaining about others “getting too much”

3 Likes

You’re back? You’re biased as hell buddy. From the posts you’ve made I can clearly see you have something agaisnt the US in general, no point even replying…

The Su-27 is higher in BR for the same reason the F/A-18C sits at the insane BR of 14.0, missile count.

Same for the Royal navy then, no double standards here.

I never complained about USA not getting enough, you’re making a strawman here, not surprising coming from you though. All you do is promote minor nations and Bring down the major ones.

You might wanna go back there bud: There is a clear bias towards the USA/USSR in the air in the BR ranges from 8.0-8.7 and that needs to be addressed - Game Discussion / Realistic Battle - War Thunder — official forum

Considering another nation got a british capital ship without representation, that’s something i will and will continue to complain about

2 Likes

And you’re free to do so, who’s gonna stop you?

My name is quite literally all nation enjoyer for a reason. I’m one of the least biased people on the platform.

I literally play USA and have their tech trees to rank 8.

As if this is the all determing factor to air engagements, get real.

What?

Implying what, that I’m wrong in that thread? lmao

2 Likes

I would argue it would have been nice to have gotten the EFT and Rafale alongside the F-15E

Yes, but when I see threads like “ABRAMS NEEDS MASSIVE BUFFS BECAUSE MERICA!!!” I just cant help but laugh at US mains. They already the second or third strongest MBT in game at the moment.

You arent following what Im saying. We got HMS Hood 3 years ago at this point, and we only jsut got Rodney and Warspite to augment her properly. In the same amount of time, US got 4 or 5 battleships. It was rather BS the distribution of ships and given everyone is still weaker than the Scharnhorst. there can be no claims of “baalncing concerns”

I havent seen a signle Brit main complain about that. We were all complaining about the lack of BOL of the T.10, which we won by the way. Most were quite excited and rather happy for the T.10 because most rather hated the decision to add Aim-9Ms to the GR7. This “fixes” that.

A CF-18 could still be an interesting filler. But Im happy with what I got. Im more mad that the EFT radar didnt get the TLC it actually needed

1 Like

Whenever i do people act as if im asking the world when in reality all im after is a british built class where its supposed to be, no disrespect meant but sometimes making a stereotype which many here do tends to get incredibly frustrating

1 Like

There’s a typo in it then, *AllNationEnjoyer_ExceptMajorOnes

Same, we got something in common at least.

Bring down the F/A-18C then, it seems the only justification for it being at 14.0 is missile count, again, “get real”.

Maybe you can develop a bit there?

Also, you missed that in your reply :

Yeah, the lack of a Revenge-Class in the British TT is a tad annoying. Though at least we did get something else and not simply nothing, that would have made me really mad

I play all nations, I enjoy all nations. You are arrogant as hell to try to claim otherwise lmao.

I think I’d know? My name doesn’t mean I don’t call out problems with the game though, such as the imbalance at 8.3-8.7 in air.

I am not speaking on the hornet.

What? You realize if someone doesn’t know what you’re talking about, it’s not always their fault, sometimes its your inane rambling? lmao

It certainly is. As a US main i surely know what stereotypes are, when you are one people just assume you want the F-35A block II with Aim-260 and god knows what. When in reality I’m sure most US mains here are satisfied with what they have.

I think your claim is justified honestly. I want the Royal Navy to be best represented in game as much as I want the US Air Force to be. As they say, Britannia rules the waves huh?

Honestly its more i want to make a lineup purely of ship classes that fought at jutland which currently i cant so

Indeed, all the primary threads about UK air this dev was about the Harriers. As all you guys wanted was for the T.10 to be playable, and as many fixes to the others ones as possible.

And on the Commonwealth Hornet, well most of you guys wouldn’t mind, the minority asking for one are from the Commonwealth nation in question it’s from.

1 Like

Says the guy who spawned in the forum to call me a clown… You are arrogant for thinking you’ve got the “superior opinion”. You just go there and say I want stuff for the US when I never said anything like that.

Do you just go around and put words in the mouths of people like that? A strawman won’t save you.
You say the same stuff all over again and try to paint me as a fool when you are the one doing this.
What’s even your point in this argument? That the US as a Nation should be deleted from the game?
It’s literally hard to know what you mean through your posts.

I Honestly don’t know what cannot be understood here, as for the “insane rambling”, you are posting in this forum without even knowing what you are argumenting for, is this a joke of some kind?

I feel like you are argumenting with the Idea of a US Main that wants his tree to be better than everyone else’s, which I clearly am not, but you wouldn’t know that because you have trouble reading my posts correctly it seems.

I’m pretty sure both of us are annoying the whole forum, don’t you wanna take it to private messages? That way you can say nonsense directly to me and not spam the thread?

So uh new thread when?

1 Like

yeah, again, not what I said, I said it was unfitting to you though you went and made it clear it actually was

where did I say I have the “superior opinion”

like you’re doing rn?