the entire T10 harrier BOL debarcle. We are getting two BOL pods now that we kicked up enough of a stink at least
1 Like
i dont know why youd want them they dont work well on hot planes
I mean, from what I understand, it wouldn’t be playable without them.
And the IRAF though it has decent semi-active and very good active radar homing missiles it’s still gets very bad IRs for 13
Well there was that but that still on par with the US, Germans and French complaints for this update
1 Like
its better than nothing. We are trying to get gaijin to change how extremely hot harriers are (they should be really damn cold, harder to lock than the F5
If you don’t like Fox-3s, why are you even concerned about the F-14A?
cause it was great back in the day you could easily counter r27ER spam with it
Threaten sails gaijin acts immediately
great dogfighter to i far would very like some AIM-9M for the B model bug report got confirmed
It’s the plane that introduced Fox-3s to WT, it always was going to face other Fox-3s as soon as those would arrive.
yeah but aim54s dont hold a candle to AIM 120 in current configuration cause gaijin wont model duel plane
Hmm. Gaijins added a bunch of strategic buildings that are not used anywhere in the patch… Well, what do you think the chances are that this is an April Fools’ prop for testing mechanics?
Yeah aim 54c should probably be more maneuverable than it currently is
Yup. I wasnt gonna buy it unless it gets BOL.
There are a lot of aircrafts that should get BOL or even cm pods that go on a hard point that don’t I’m kind of disappointed with them because of this
2 Likes
I mean it would be playable as it has phimat chaff however it would only get 60 flares when the NA (which flies and bombs better) has 150% of the flare count
here ya go thats what she shpuld do
scrub to like half way
2 Likes
agreed. the case by case basis is quite unfair.
1 Like
incredible information
2 Likes