It cant hold any damage in any hands.
1 Like
You are right, Russian now needs a better air advanced jet fighter with better Fox-3 missiles than R77, like R77-1, but not the best CAS capacity they already got in current game that the kh38s give to. And for SU30SM’s great engines and radar really made it the chrono legionnaire that introduced in Red Alert 2. Maybe the su30 is much better for WT now but not the SM one.
1 Like
Can dish out plenty though. Decent players in an Abrams can do massive damage to enemy teams, unfortunately decent players are hard to come by these days in US top tier teams.
They are still good tanks for only camping XD
Well, if youre talking about flanking/etc - sure, abrams can be named good, but for that Type10 would be better tbh, just due of faster reload
Flanking, sniping, supporting, hell even some level of brawling is doable in the Abrams if the player has 4 braincells that work together from time to time.
It’s marvelous what the Abrams can do when the player doesn’t just hold W in it.
Other MBTs can easily perform better in such things.
Abrams is “glass gun”
Merkava, Challengers, Arietes, ZTZ99s, T-90M and VT-4 all perform worse in such situations.
Leopard 2A5/6s all perform similar in such situations (worse reload for better hull down survivability).
Leclerc and BVM are debatable, I think the Leclercs perform equally good as the Abrams because I like them, but the stats don’t always support that claim. BVM is at best a sidegrade (before the upcoming Abrams nerf).
Only the 2A7s/Strv 122s perform flat out better.
2 Likes
I wouldn’t call the ztz99’s worse
1 Like
Worse pen, seriously worse reload, worse gun depression, worse gun handling, Armor not impressive at all.
Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy my ZTZ99A/WZ1001 (screw the VT-4 though), but it’s mobility is all it really has going for it. Also specifically for flanking, sniping, supporting and especially brawling that reload is a death sentence.
Hello Smin1080p
Could you check this issue
OF-40 (MTCA), OF-40 Mk.2a and OF-40 mk.1 clipping model // Gaijin.net // Issues
The tank gun is clipping through the hull when facing backward
I don’t know why everyone hates the vt4, I rather enjoy it.
1 Like
Dude W name
It can take some shots in hull down
Try to play ariete or merkava when even 3bm60 can pen ur turret
Abrams is mid not great not bad
Seriously?? The T90M gets the toughest hull and the best ERA
1 Like
[DEV]The F-14B was missed when adding IRST/EOTS - SARH guidance
[DEV]LITENING AT (AAQ-28(V)4)A2A tracking and SARH / ARH support
- As an aside I don’t think there has been any confirmation as to if a USN or USMC Hornet is being modeled; there is some potential for equipment fitout to shift significantly depending on which it is, so may be relevant to the F-18C (Late) as it is relates to the USMC config Hornet.
The next two are practically placeholders, as the Kurnass-2000 is the only Vehicle that has the TISEO implemented so far (though others could receive it), and as such impact would be minimal at best though may impact radar slaving the seeker of IR missiles though the “Notch” more reliably.
[DEV]TISEO equipt F-4’s should receive IRST/EOTS SARH support
This is preempting the addition of the AN/AQ-228 to the Later F/A-18s as an option should it be needed, but is not yet implemented for any airframes at this point in time.
[DEV]ATFLIR A2A tracking and SARH / ARH support
- This is relevant to the potentially USN configured Hornet.
The only sources I’m missing is one for the AAS-38 NiteHawk pod (what i do have is fairly weak). But these reports cover a significant chunk of top tier airframes.
2 Likes
T90m is amazing and ztz or vt4 are more then decent
Do not compare them to the cardboards with guns that called ariete and merkava
But abrams’ giant cable made its horizontal driver sooooooo fragile.
1 Like
yeah which is almost everything post WW2 right?