Well Kommuna and Izmail is 7.0 but not 7.0 worthy at this point. So 3 vs 2 in my point. And as Warspite is in, now it’s 3 vs 3. And you better point out Japan or Germany than USSR for number of righteous 7.0 ships
It seems so? I think Royal Oak is much more famous than Royal Soverign
Haha, for this situation, just let it show whether it will support the Russian tree to get anything from Ukraine (including NATO-aided aircraft, tanks, etc.).
As a Harrier Fangirl, should I get popcorn for tomorrow?
Im getting mixed up discard that. I was looking at barham at the time.
Will we get a revenge class in the near future then?
In terms of equals revenge is more notable as shes pretty much the only other member of the class that could equal RS
Holy crap didnt realise how many 7.0 japan has, and we arent even close to their real big uns
Tbh i also consider yamashiro as one due to the fact it can hold its own there
Does this mean there will be no J35F or J with Gods greatest missile (the Falcons) for 2 years then?
As I’m not US and European person, actually Royal Oak is even more famous than Revenge or RS because of its sunk by u-boat by here.
Well still I think UK has Revenge or Ramilies(this is one I actually Prefer), so giving RS to USSR is not a big problem.
Indeed, I just want Nelson and Vanguard for this year, not Revenge class as other nations would powercreep at this year as same. Not good for GRB only to go pastward
Tbh i just want a revenge class to make a full “grand fleet” lineup
thats clearly coming in 2030 because a player asked for it so we must see random vehicles one guy asked for three months ago first
At least it’s coming at some point
I try to avoid cope when i can and back stuff with examples and given gaijins prior track record the way i listed it above is the most logical way they will handle it. Its not a good way but they’ve done similar things in the past. I want actual balance but the snail doesn’t care about that.
I mean Bear kept saying gaijin has changed and that what i said wouldn’t come true since im always so damn negative yet im like this because ive seen it a million times and ill keep seeing it because i know how the snail works unfortunately and it happens again and again.
Id think of Revenge, RS and Resolution before the Oak personally
ill be in my 30s by the time it probably does
Yes
yet they still have more tech tree 7.0s (5 vs 2 soon to be 3) like you cant say they lack options then they have more 7.0s by almost double
also wait no sorry, italy has 4 whole battleships they could get including Leonardo Da Vinci because I forgot the Andrea Doria and her sister were already in game and they even have the Francesco, so their only actual ships they have left are the Litorio-class, so removing one of Italy’s options and giving it to the soviets is a slap in the face
I understand if you cannot definitively answer, but are the devs aware that LJDAM is just a JDAM with laser sensor, so anything that can carry JDAM can carry LJDAM in those same spaces (even if they don’t have a laser designator)?
I’m not really familiar with EGBU but I’m guessing same applies to that, except the aircraft would have to be GPS munitions compatible
Why though? For ground vehicles it isn’t an issue. One prototype can be placed in two different tech trees. Some naval rules are quite disappointing.
What can be done to change this?
I would like to see both Regina Maria and Regele Ferdinand in Romanian service for example (we have one of them as war prize in Soviet TT - Letuchiy).
In what section can I suggest changes to this policy?
I would also like to propose suggestion to correct RoF with a balancing factor to avoid such situations as with same 100 mm Minizini cannons on Italian and Soviet ships having different RoF, because of different values in each nation sources.
Wait we have a Romanian ship in the Russian trer ?