As far as I am aware. Should be 1 for 1 what the Gr7 has, though Im hoping for 9Ls not 9Ms for the 11.7 BR.
If it does have 9Ms I dont see the point in purchasing it and likely wont. But 9Ls… would be very very tempting purchase
1 Like
Same, I love the GR7 but hate its BR. So hoping for a lower one with the appropriate load out nerfs
Yep, 12.7 without a radar just sucks in SB.
Biggest mistake giving the Gr7 the Aim-9Ms imo.
But I do fear them adding it with only 9Ls and then upgrading it to 9Ms shortly afterwards and then giving it the BR increase, that would make me pissed
when is MITL scheduled to be modelled on MITL missiles
Its not as far as I am aware.
My bug report for DL on the Paveway IV was denied (and not even passed as a suggestion) because they wont be modeling MITL
Hello. It has been fixed according to this report that you tagged me with: Community Bug Reporting System
Which is to do with lower speed turns. Any seperate issues should be seperatly reported (it should always be 1 issue per report).
Good Morning as well.
I am so sorry to bother you by asking this, I am just curious about the maybe comments from the Official Developer Stream.
Just was wondering if there was any consideration for more F/A-18s this patch for any nations, like if the decision is still up in the air.
You probably can’t confirm anything this early, and these certain nations don’t need it, considering the Eurofighter is there and is strong right now. I was only curious if so, but thank you for any response anyway.
Oh… so nothing about this and main part of the issue?
Second issue: the TKX and Type 10 can not turn smoothly, it is like these vehicles always want to engage neutral steering even when driving fast forward and it makes the vehicle drifting rather than turn smoothly which also significantly reducing the speed everytime the vehicle turns. Again used Type 90 for comparison.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TbYhWVPM5E4&ab_channel=I_NAMELESS_I-JGSDF
There goes my joy then, F
The main part of the report was fixed. As I mentioned, it’s precisely for this reason different issues should not be bundled together.
There are no further F/A-18 variants currently planned for this major update.
6 Likes
I mean, we could give it the IRIS T it actually uses if you’d prefer, but there is a difference between additions based on necessity and additions based on avarice
Every single example you gave was because without those features there would be missing capability that would have an adverse effect on gameplay.
That wouldn’t be the case with the US getting Meteors and ASRAAMs, given that you have the AIM-9X and soon enough the AIM-260 which do the same thing
I think it’s fair to say we should remain realistic when reasonable, and only bend the rules when it would cause unnecessary frustration not to.
2 Likes
Thank you so much for responding, totally understandable.
Is there anything else coming for new Italian Tornado?
The aircraft will have more advanced GBUs over the standard IDS 1995.
3 Likes
Any chance that we can nudge for a Early/Late split on the rapier for this patch with a impact fuse version at a lower BR? AFAIK it wouldnt require a new model as the missiles on the current one are post upgrades missiles from the late 80s onwards.
Made a suggestion for it in the dev server forum. Think it would be lovely to get more use out of the long awaited vehicle.
2 Likes
Feedback has already forwarded. But at the moment there is no news.
3 Likes
Damn.
Thanks for the update on that. Sorry for messaging a lot, I have a bit of an IRL issue going on and trying to keep my mind off it (those who remember last patch I had issues for my dog stopping me from pushing/researching reports, well, today is the day sadly).
Again, cheers, I really like rapier and glad to know the idea is at least being noticed ^^. Heck I would even pay money for it xD
@Smin1080p_WT Could you comment on this please in regard to the J-11B, would it be reasonable to expect either the J-8s or J-11s be foldered?
1 Like