Same with F-2s XF-2A (sparrows and prototype J/APG-1) could be premium, F-2A early can be TT but maybe bit lower then 14.0 since sparrows. and F-2A late being top with F-2A ADTW (F-X) radar being the end of line (till F-3 ;D)
I still don’t get the point of giving Britain the Indian Sub Tree if Gaijin refuses to give Britain the Indian vehicles. Like where tf is the Su-30?
No Britain doesn’t NEED it but at the end of the day, it’s an indian vehicle, it’s relatively unique, and I’d like to see it in game.
I mean at top tier it’ll mostly be India doing the heavy lifting for that. I think SA is mostly done for at top tier.
Ideally 13.0, its practically similar to the F/A-18C ‘Early’.
has radar and FM on the 12.7 sparrow F-16’s. and doesnt AESA help a lot with SARH missiles? could easily be 13.3, but could also be fine at 13.0
MiG-31 early variant, my guess
But I suppose gajin add MiG-29KR from russian navy before MiG-35S
Gajin might add AIM-9M-8, AIM-9M-9, AIM-120C-3, AIM-120C-4 and AIM-120C-5 model for 4 USA fighter aircraft top tier after this quarter
Fighter aircraft rank 2 & rank 4 from WW2 and early cold war, the early domestic USN 1st gen fighter aircraft before F2H-2 and another fighter aircraft for USA tech tree in rank 6 ?
That is supposedly going to be 12.7 on live, the 13.0 it has now is a “bug”
Yea we all do. Unfortunately a lot of trees don’t get the actually new vehicle additions, just C&P from America or ussr when they have actual domestic options. USA shouldn’t get favoured treatment over them in volume of content
fine with domestic additions, its a good thing for trees.
but US getting more stuff doesnt mean it has favored treatment, 1% of US possible additions is more than 1% of Israel possible additions for example
a stance that blatantly favours you over 80% of the nations in game is not one that anyone will assume you take in good faith
so saying im fine with the Avro Vulcan, Tu-95, and B-47 is a bad stance?
Has anyone got a brick wall near by, I would like non smooth brick faces please
No, but saying its fine for domestic additions to be added on masse, but not imports or subtree vehicles is basically saying that Russia and the US should get preferential treatment, that they’re somehow more important than the other 8 nations
Comparing a Vulcan to 15 F-15 I mean Jesus H Christ
Getting more things over counterparts is favourable treatment. The USA tree is already one of the most filled out and best overall trees in land sea and air modes and its in the best interests of the game for other trees to have significant catchup time.
Yes but adding 7 vehicles to a tree which already has hundreds isn’t as necessary as adding 7 to a tree with less than 50 platforms. Let them catch up you’re not missing out
The U.S., USSR, China should reasonably have more additions per update than the other nations (simply by virtue of just having more things to add)
However, other nations should be getting unique vehicles more often, instead of the typical copy paste slop. Like, France this update is getting
- A Tiger UHT Copy Paste that they didn’t want, ask for, or need
- The DF105 a tank that took 4 YEARS for Gaijin to port from the German tree (and which adds nothing to the french tree)
- The Clovis (which is a GE premium for france meaning it’s very elaborately more of a cash grab than the German one)
- Low tier rat car, which is amazing. The best addition for france this update.
Honestly the car and Harry is the best additions for this update
F-15I late with R2D2 dome, SPICE, and whatever israeli avionics they threw in there.
thats what i mean by “more domestic additions are good”
C&P isn’t a bad addition if you ask me; however, the fact that it makes up the majority of what a nation is getting in said update is a bad thing.
Here is how I rank additions
Best - Unique Addition that fills a gap in a tree
Good - Copy paste addition that fills a gap in a tree
Ok - Unique addition that adds nothing to the tree
Atrocious - Copy paste addition that adds nothing to the tree