Yep. It`s different modernisation programm.
They went with the AN/APG-79, they didn’t pick up the AN/APG-83 for service on the Hornets
Gaijin doesn’t give a damn about that. If there is at least one aircraft with such a radar, they can enter it.
he has a point now where my thrust vectoring eurofighter
But it wouldn’t be logical which is what you said
Truuuuuu
someone finally mentioned
Ah, increase countermeasures higher 60
Personally, gajin might decompression max BR to 14.3 before AIM-9L replace with AIM-9X (Blk 1), AIM-120C-3 or AIM-120C-4 instead AIM-120B and add AIM-120C-5 on F/A-18C Late
But change targeting pod Litening II to Litening AT ?
Sadly, I never saw MiG-29SMT (9-19) mounted R-77-1
But I suppose MiG-29K (9-41) (IN), MiG-29KR (9-41R), MiG-35, Su-30SM2, Su-35S and MiG-31BM armed R-77-1
From the gaijin’s point - it`s logical.
Ok, then they should add this as well
No, the logical thing would just be to add the Super Hornet
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
i fail to see whats wrong with the devil’s lettuce.
I hate asymmetrical loadouts so much, ugh
But hell yeah, gimme a Strikemaster with Sidewinders!
Or F-18C with E AESA… And SLAM… And LJDAM… And JSOW…
and 120C-5 + 9X
Why pick out a singular test version of a vehicle we have plenty of already, while at the same time denying the reasonable addition of a new vehicle, with the exact same specific thing you want from the first
You might get your F/A-18C with AN/APG-79 later on, but there is no reason to expect a F/A-18C with AN/APG-83 just because they test fitted one on a F/A-18C once
You think Gaijin will release the F-18E by the end of beta??