Yes, it did
The easiest way to tell PL-8 from PL-8B is the opaque seeker. This doesn’t apply in game though because gaijin botched the visual model and modeled the PL-8 as the PL-8B.
I would like to see these sources you’re finding, they’re wrong.
j8F + Ls-6
2 Likes
PL-12 and AAM-4 are AIM-120C5 equals, can be buffed by add more power.
Mica is another problem, its engine power is fine, only a total rework about tvc control can help
And reducing drag with a re-model. It is currently 2cm too thick in diameter.
That one’s more C-1 level, however regardless, all ARH missiles in game should get buffed, as all are underperforming. The AAM-4 getting buffed would also give Japan a 14.0 fighter if the F-2A isn’t added.
Yes.
No.
4 Likes
Glorious.
1 Like
Literally two weeks after I finally get the F-16A
1 Like
Peak
1 Like
I think it’s c5, c1 is just a a/b with smaller fins isn’t it?
c1 could be early SD-10, it gets several improvements before come into service.
The C-1 I’ve read also has a slightly better engine. If not, the PL-12 should be between the C-1 and C-5.
1 Like
should be, irl PL-12’s dV is about 3Mach
Assuming the PL-8B gets its upgraded engine and if the PL-12 also did, the J-11B would be an absolute monster, maybe even the best fighter in the game, even if only by a small margin.
1 Like
Just spent the last 15 minutes double checking. Alll i can find is that it has a bunch of quality of life stuff in the cockpit that will only help with sim battles, maybe a better radar and worse maneuverability. The domestic missiles we know.